Cited 0 times in

Clinical Relevance of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimally Invasive versus Open Hysterectomy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김영태-
dc.contributor.author남은지-
dc.contributor.author어경진-
dc.contributor.author이영주-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T02:30:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-12T02:30:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195332-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of vaginal cuff dehiscence following a hysterectomy. Data were prospectively collected from all patients who underwent hysterectomies at a tertiary academic medical center between 2014 and 2018. The incidence and clinical factors of vaginal cuff dehiscence after minimally invasive versus open hysterectomy were compared. Vaginal cuff dehiscence occurred in 1.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7–1.3%) of women who underwent either form of hysterectomy. Among those who underwent open (n = 1458), laparoscopic (n = 3191), and robot-assisted (n = 423) hysterectomies, vaginal cuff dehiscence occurred in 15 (1.0%), 33 (1.0%), and 3 (0.7%) cases, respectively. No significant differences in cuff dehiscence occurrence were identified in patients who underwent various modes of hysterectomies. A multivariate logistic regression model was created using the variables indication for surgery and body mass index. Both variables were identified as independent risk factors for vaginal cuff dehiscence (odds ratio [OR]: 2.74; 95% CI, 1.51–4.98 and OR: 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09–4.41, respectively). The incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence was exceedingly low in patients who underwent various modes of hysterectomies. The risk of cuff dehiscence was predominantly influenced by surgical indications and obesity. Thus, the different modes of hysterectomy do not influence the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence. © 2023 by the authors.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleClinical Relevance of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimally Invasive versus Open Hysterectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Jin Eoh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joo Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ji Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye In Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Tae Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm12083001-
dc.contributor.localIdA00729-
dc.contributor.localIdA01262-
dc.contributor.localIdA04842-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03556-
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383-
dc.identifier.pmid37109333-
dc.subject.keywordcomplication-
dc.subject.keyworddehiscence-
dc.subject.keywordhysterectomy-
dc.subject.keywordminimally invasive surgical procedure-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김영태-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor남은지-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor어경진-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage3001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, Vol.12(8) : 3001, 2023-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.