0 393

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Deep learning model for diagnosing gastric mucosal lesions using endoscopic images: development, validation, and method comparison

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNam, Joon Yeul-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hyung Jin-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Kyu Sung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyuk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Jun-
dc.contributor.authorSoh, Hosim-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Eun Ae-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Soo-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Jong Chul-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Jong Pil-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sang Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Joo Sung-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hyunsoo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong-Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-02T00:47:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-02T00:47:15Z-
dc.date.created2023-03-28-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.issn0016-5107-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/194430-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Endoscopic differential diagnoses of gastric mucosal lesions (benign gastric ulcer, early gastric cancer [EGC], and advanced gastric cancer) remain challenging. We aimed to develop and validate convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence (AI) models: lesion detection, differential diagnosis (AI-DDx), and invasion depth (AI-ID; pT1a vs pT1b among EGC) models. Methods: This study included 1366 consecutive patients with gastric mucosal lesions from 2 referral centers in Korea. One representative endoscopic image from each patient was used. Histologic diagnoses were set as the criterion standard. Performance of the AI-DDx (training/internal/external validation set, 1009/112/245) and AI-ID (training/internal/external validation set, 620/68/155) was compared with visual diagnoses by independent endoscopists (stratified by novice [<1 year of experience], intermediate [2-3 years of experience], and expert [>5 years of experience]) and EUS results, respectively. Results: The AI-DDx showed good diagnostic performance for both internal (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = .86) and external validation (AUROC = .86). The performance of the AI-DDx was better than that of novice (AUROC = .82, P = .01) and intermediate endoscopists (AUROC = .84, P = .02) but was comparable with experts (AUROC = .89, P = .12) in the external validation set. The AI-ID showed a fair performance in both internal (AUROC = .78) and external validation sets (AUROC = .73), which were significantly better than EUS results performed by experts (internal validation, AUROC = .62; external validation, AUROC = .56; both P < .001). Conclusions: The AI-DDx was comparable with experts and outperformed novice and intermediate endoscopists for the differential diagnosis of gastric mucosal lesions. The AI-ID performed better than EUS for evaluation of invasion depth.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMosby Yearbook-
dc.relation.isPartOfGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY-
dc.relation.isPartOfGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDeep learning model for diagnosing gastric mucosal lesions using endoscopic images: development, validation, and method comparison-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNam, Joon Yeul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Hyung Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Kyu Sung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Hyuk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae Jun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoh, Hosim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKang, Eun Ae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Soo-Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYe, Jong Chul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIm, Jong Pil-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sang Gyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Joo Sung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Hyunsoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jeong-Hoon-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.022-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00920-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-6779-
dc.identifier.pmid34492271-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Eun Ae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKang, Eun Ae-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85118356475-
dc.identifier.wosid000743747500008-
dc.citation.volume95-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage258-
dc.citation.endPage268-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, Vol.95(2) : 258-268, 2022-02-
dc.identifier.rimsid78136-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCANCER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusULTRASONOGRAPHY-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.