0 370

Cited 0 times in

Cited 35 times in

Limited liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: international multicentre propensity score-matched and coarsened exact-matched analysis comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorD'Silva, Mizelle-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ho-Seong-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Rong-
dc.contributor.authorKingham, Thomas Peter-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Gi-Hong-
dc.contributor.authorSyn, Nicholas Li-Xun-
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, Mikel-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sung-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorSucandy, Iswanto-
dc.contributor.authorChiow, Adrian Kah Heng-
dc.contributor.authorMarino, Marco Vito-
dc.contributor.authorEfanov, Mikhail-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, Robert Peter-
dc.contributor.authorChong, Charing Ching Ning-
dc.contributor.authorChung-Ngai Tang-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Tan-To-
dc.contributor.authorPratschke, Johann-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoying-
dc.contributor.authorPark, James Oh-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Chung Yip-
dc.contributor.authorScatton, Olivier-
dc.contributor.authorRotellar, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorTroisi, Roberto Ivan-
dc.contributor.authorD'Hondt, Mathieu-
dc.contributor.authorFuks, David-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Brian Kim Poh-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-21T07:17:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-21T07:17:08Z-
dc.date.created2023-01-19-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193293-
dc.description.abstractBackground Limited liver resections (LLRs) for tumours located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver are technically demanding procedures. This study compared outcomes of robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L) LLR for tumours located in the posterosuperior liver segments (IV, VII, and VIII). Methods This was an international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients who underwent R-LLR or L-LLR at 24 centres between 2010 and 2019. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analysed; 1 : 3 propensity score matching (PSM) and 1 : 1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) were performed. Results Of 1566 patients undergoing R-LLR and L-LLR, 983 met the study inclusion criteria. Before matching, 159 R-LLRs and 824 L-LLRs were included. After 1 : 3 PSM of 127 R-LLRs and 381 L-LLRs, comparison of perioperative outcomes showed that median blood loss (100 (i.q.r. 40-200) versus 200 (100-500) ml; P = 0.003), blood loss of at least 500 ml (9 (7.4 per cent) versus 94 (27.6 per cent); P < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion rate (4 (3.1 per cent) versus 38 (10.0 per cent); P = 0.025), rate of conversion to open surgery (1 (0.8 per cent) versus 30 (7.9 per cent); P = 0.022), median duration of Pringle manoeuvre when applied (30 (20-46) versus 40 (25-58) min; P = 0.012), and median duration of operation (175 (130-255) versus 224 (155-300); P < 0.001) were lower in the R-LLR group compared with the L-LLR group. After 1 : 1 CEM of 104 R-LLRs with 104 L-LLRs, R-LLR was similarly associated with significantly reduced blood loss and a lower rate of conversion to open surgery. Conclusion Based on a matched analysis of well selected patients, both robotic and laparoscopic access could be undertaken safely with good outcomes for tumours in the posterosuperior liver segments. This international multicentre matched comparative study comparing robotic and laparoscopic limited liver resections for tumours in the posterosuperior segments demonstrated that the robotic approach was associated with significantly less blood loss, shorter operating time, and lower open conversion rate than the laparoscopic procedure.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.isPartOfBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY-
dc.relation.isPartOfBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleLimited liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: international multicentre propensity score-matched and coarsened exact-matched analysis comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorD&apos;Silva, Mizelle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Ho-Seong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLiu, Rong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKingham, Thomas Peter-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Gi-Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSyn, Nicholas Li-Xun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPrieto, Mikel-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Sung-Hoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSucandy, Iswanto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChiow, Adrian Kah Heng-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarino, Marco Vito-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEfanov, Mikhail-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jae-Hoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSutcliffe, Robert Peter-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChong, Charing Ching Ning-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung-Ngai Tang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheung, Tan-To-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPratschke, Johann-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWang, Xiaoying-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, James Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChan, Chung Yip-
dc.contributor.googleauthorScatton, Olivier-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRotellar, Fernando-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTroisi, Roberto Ivan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorD&apos;Hondt, Mathieu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFuks, David-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGoh, Brian Kim Poh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znac270-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00418-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2168-
dc.identifier.pmid36052580-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Gi Hong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Gi-Hong-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85140144617-
dc.identifier.wosid000848665600001-
dc.citation.volume109-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage1140-
dc.citation.endPage1149-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Vol.109(11) : 1140-1149, 2022-10-
dc.identifier.rimsid76981-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTUMORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFEASIBILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURVIVAL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLESIONS-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.