64 209

Cited 21 times in

Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Stomach Preservation in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author안지영-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T02:45:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T02:45:59Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191683-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare postoperative complications, long-term survival, and quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) and laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: Five hundred eighty patients with preoperatively diagnosed stage IA gastric adenocarcinoma (≤ 3 cm) were assigned to undergo either LSG or LSNNS. Observers were not blinded to patient grouping. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, QOL, 3-year disease-specific survival (3y-DSS), and 3-year overall survival (3y-OS). Results: In total, 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population for the primary outcome (LSG, 269; LSNNS, 258). Stomach-preserving surgery was performed in 210 patients (81%) in the LSNNS group. During the median follow-up duration, the 3y-DFS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 95.5% and 91.8%, respectively (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI, -0.6 to 8.1). Three patients with recurrence and five with metachronous gastric cancer in the LSNNS group underwent standard surgery. Two patients with distant metastasis in both groups were treated with palliative chemotherapy. The 3y-DSS and 3y-OS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 99.5% and 99.1% (P = .59) and 99.2% and 97.6% (P = .17), respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 19.0% of the LSG group and 15.5% of the LSNNS group (P = .294). The LSNNS group showed better physical function (P = .015), less symptoms (P < .001), and improved nutrition than the LSG group. Conclusion: LSNNS did not show noninferiority to LSG for 3y-DFS, with a 5% margin. However, the 3y-DSS and 3y-OS were not different after rescue surgery in cases of recurrence/metachronous gastric cancer, and LSNNS had better long-term QOL and nutrition than LSG. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01804998.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHGastrectomy / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHQuality of Life-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleLaparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Stomach Preservation in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Woo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Seok Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong Man Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Yeong An-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBang Wool Eom-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHoon Hur-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyu Seok Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Kyu Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi Ran Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Ho Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jin Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Ho Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Cherl Kook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMira Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung-Ho Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKeun Won Ryu-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.21.02242-
dc.contributor.localIdA02264-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid35324317-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameAn, Ji Yeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안지영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor형우진-
dc.citation.volume40-
dc.citation.number21-
dc.citation.startPage2342-
dc.citation.endPage2351-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.40(21) : 2342-2351, 2022-07-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.