19 213

Cited 23 times in

Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

Authors
 Baek-Yeol Ryoo  ;  Ann-Li Cheng  ;  Zhenggang Ren  ;  Tae-You Kim  ;  Hongming Pan  ;  Kun-Ming Rau  ;  Hye Jin Choi  ;  Joong-Won Park  ;  Jee Hyun Kim  ;  Chia Jui Yen  ;  Ho Yeong Lim  ;  Dongli Zhou  ;  Josef Straub  ;  Juergen Scheele  ;  Karin Berghoff  ;  Shukui Qin 
Citation
 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, Vol.125(2) : 200-208, 2021-07 
Journal Title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN
 0007-0920 
Issue Date
2021-07
MeSH
Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Asians / genetics ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / genetics ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy* ; Liver Neoplasms / genetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Piperidines / administration & dosage* ; Piperidines / adverse effects ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met / genetics* ; Pyridazines / administration & dosage* ; Pyridazines / adverse effects ; Pyrimidines / administration & dosage* ; Pyrimidines / adverse effects ; Sorafenib / administration & dosage* ; Sorafenib / adverse effects ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Up-Regulation*
Abstract
Background: This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression.

Methods: In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP).

Results: In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26-0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib.

Conclusions: Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.
Files in This Item:
T9992022279.pdf Download
DOI
10.1038/s41416-021-01380-3
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Hye Jin(최혜진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-1400
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190868
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links