0 211

Cited 45 times in

Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author조규호-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T00:31:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T00:31:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.issn0028-3878-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190738-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: To test the hypothesis that a multicenter-validated computer deep learning algorithm detects MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Methods: We used clinically acquired 3-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI of 148 patients (median age 23 years [range 2-55 years]; 47% female) with histologically verified FCD at 9 centers to train a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. Images were initially deemed MRI-negative in 51% of patients, in whom intracranial EEG determined the focus. For risk stratification, the CNN incorporated bayesian uncertainty estimation as a measure of confidence. To evaluate performance, detection maps were compared to expert FCD manual labels. Sensitivity was tested in an independent cohort of 23 cases with FCD (13 ± 10 years). Applying the algorithm to 42 healthy controls and 89 controls with temporal lobe epilepsy disease tested specificity. Results: Overall sensitivity was 93% (137 of 148 FCD detected) using a leave-one-site-out cross-validation, with an average of 6 false positives per patient. Sensitivity in MRI-negative FCD was 85%. In 73% of patients, the FCD was among the clusters with the highest confidence; in half, it ranked the highest. Sensitivity in the independent cohort was 83% (19 of 23; average of 5 false positives per patient). Specificity was 89% in healthy and disease controls. Discussion: This first multicenter-validated deep learning detection algorithm yields the highest sensitivity to date in MRI-negative FCD. By pairing predictions with risk stratification, this classifier may assist clinicians in adjusting hypotheses relative to other tests, increasing diagnostic confidence. Moreover, generalizability across age and MRI hardware makes this approach ideal for presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative epilepsy. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that deep learning on multimodal MRI accurately identifies FCD in patients with epilepsy initially diagnosed as MRI negative.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfNEUROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHChild-
dc.subject.MESHChild, Preschool-
dc.subject.MESHDeep Learning*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*-
dc.subject.MESHImaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging / methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMalformations of Cortical Development / diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeuroimaging / methods*-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleMulticenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Neurology (신경과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRavnoor Singh Gill-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyo-Min Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBenoit Caldairou-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok-Jun Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCarmen Barba-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFrancesco Deleo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLudovico D'Incerti-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVanessa Cristina Mendes Coelho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMatteo Lenge-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMira Semmelroch-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDewi Victoria Schrader-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabrice Bartolomei-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMaxime Guye-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndreas Schulze-Bonhage-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHorst Urbach-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyoo Ho Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFernando Cendes-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRenzo Guerrini-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGraeme Jackson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorR Edward Hogan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNeda Bernasconi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrea Bernasconi-
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/WNL.0000000000012698-
dc.contributor.localIdA03811-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02340-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-632X-
dc.identifier.pmid34521691-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012698-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Kyoo Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조규호-
dc.citation.volume97-
dc.citation.number16-
dc.citation.startPageE1571-
dc.citation.endPageE1582-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNEUROLOGY, Vol.97(16) : E1571-E1582, 2021-10-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurology (신경과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.