119 330

Cited 4 times in

Comparison of the effects of inhalational and total intravenous anesthesia on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a randomized controlled trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김도형-
dc.contributor.author김의현-
dc.contributor.author민경태-
dc.contributor.author최승호-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T00:20:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-23T00:20:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/189384-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has shown promising results. However, fast and high-quality recovery after this procedure remains a challenge for neuroanesthesiologists. This study aimed to compare the quality of recovery after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery between patients who received inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane and patients who received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Methods: Eighty-two patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were randomized to receive either sevoflurane inhalation with manual infusion of remifentanil (sevoflurane group) or effect-site target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil (TIVA group). The primary outcome was the 40-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1. The QoR-40 questionnaire was completed by patients the day before surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2. Emergence agitation and recovery characteristics were also assessed. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in the global QoR-40 scores on both postoperative days 1 and 2 (difference -8.7, 95% CI -18.0 to 0.7, and P = 0.204; -3.6, 95% CI -13.0 to 5.8, and P > 0.999, respectively). The time to verbal response and time to extubation were significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group than in the TIVA group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, the incidence of emergence agitation was lower in the TIVA group than in the sevoflurane group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol-based TIVA were appropriate anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in terms of the quality of recovery up to 2 days postoperatively. Rapid emergence was observed in the sevoflurane group, while smooth emergence was observed in the TIVA group.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIvyspring International Publisher-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthesia, Intravenous / methods-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthetics, Inhalation*-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthetics, Intravenous-
dc.subject.MESHEmergence Delirium* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHPropofol*-
dc.subject.MESHRemifentanil-
dc.subject.MESHSevoflurane-
dc.titleComparison of the effects of inhalational and total intravenous anesthesia on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDo-Hyeong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyeong Tae Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEui Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Seo Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Ho Choi-
dc.identifier.doi10.7150/ijms.72758-
dc.contributor.localIdA00390-
dc.contributor.localIdA00837-
dc.contributor.localIdA01400-
dc.contributor.localIdA04101-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02917-
dc.identifier.eissn1449-1907-
dc.identifier.pmid35813289-
dc.subject.keywordinhalational anesthesia-
dc.subject.keywordintravenous anesthesia-
dc.subject.keywordpituitary surgery-
dc.subject.keywordpostoperative recovery-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Do Hyeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김도형-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김의현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor민경태-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최승호-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage1056-
dc.citation.endPage1064-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, Vol.19(6) : 1056-1064, 2022-06-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.