0 96

Cited 0 times in

Feasibility and safety of the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach in the resection of aortocaval and infrarenal paraganglioma: a single-center experience

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강상욱-
dc.contributor.author김진경-
dc.contributor.author남기현-
dc.contributor.author이잔디-
dc.contributor.author이초록-
dc.contributor.author정웅윤-
dc.contributor.author정종주-
dc.contributor.author최선형-
dc.contributor.author최순민-
dc.contributor.author최혜련-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T05:51:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-11T05:51:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187837-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) has been under attention as a method for resection of paraganglioma (PGL) for the past few years. However, only a few studies have explored the effectiveness and safety of the PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection. Methods: We designed this retrospective study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection in a single center. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent PRA for PGL resection at our medical center from January 2006 to March 2021. Eight patients were enrolled, of whom six had aortocaval PGL. We investigated the surgical outcomes of enrolled patients. Results: The locations of the tumors in relation to the renal vein were: suprarenal in two (25.0%) patients, at the renal vein level in three (37.5%) patients, and infrarenal in three (37.5%) patients. The mean operative time of the enrolled patients was 101.5 ± 39.1 min. The mean postoperative stay was 3.5 ± 1.5 days, and the estimated blood loss was 31.3 ± 51.4 ml. There was one minor complication (chyle leakage), and two hypotensive events occurred during the surgery. Focusing on the results of the renal vein level and infrarenal PGL resection, the mean operative time, mean postoperative stay, and estimated blood loss of the patients were 109.2 ± 41.3 min, 3.5 ± 1.8 days, and 41.7 ± 56.4 ml, respectively. Conclusion: The PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection is feasible and safe. Additional data analysis and long-term follow-up are needed in the future.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdrenalectomy-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy*-
dc.subject.MESHParaganglioma* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleFeasibility and safety of the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach in the resection of aortocaval and infrarenal paraganglioma: a single-center experience-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Min Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun Hyung Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Ryeon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Kyong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho Rok Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJandee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Ju Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKee-Hyun Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoong Youn Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Wook Kang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-021-08662-0-
dc.contributor.localIdA00032-
dc.contributor.localIdA05739-
dc.contributor.localIdA01245-
dc.contributor.localIdA03066-
dc.contributor.localIdA03256-
dc.contributor.localIdA03674-
dc.contributor.localIdA03722-
dc.contributor.localIdA05053-
dc.contributor.localIdA05941-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02703-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218-
dc.identifier.pmid34341907-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-021-08662-0-
dc.subject.keywordAortocaval paraganglioma-
dc.subject.keywordInfrarenal paraganglioma-
dc.subject.keywordParaganglioma-
dc.subject.keywordPosterior retroperitoneoscopic approach-
dc.subject.keywordSurgical outcome-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Sang Wook-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor강상욱-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김진경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor남기현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이잔디-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이초록-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정웅윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정종주-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최선형-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최순민-
dc.citation.volume35-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage7246-
dc.citation.endPage7252-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.35(12) : 7246-7252, 2021-12-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.