225 550

Cited 0 times in

Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박주현-
dc.contributor.author서석교-
dc.contributor.author안소현-
dc.contributor.author이명지-
dc.contributor.author이병석-
dc.contributor.author조시현-
dc.contributor.author최영식-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T16:42:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-28T16:42:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/186761-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was performed on 236 robotic myomectomies at a university medical center. After 1:1 propensity score matching for the total myoma number, total myoma diameter, and patient age, 90 patients in each group (RSS: n = 90; RMP: n = 90) were evaluated. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed. Results: The body mass index, parity, preoperative hemoglobin levels, mean maximal myoma diameter, and anatomical type of myoma showed no mean differences between RSS and RMP myomectomies. The RSS group was younger, had lesser number of myomas removed, and had a smaller sum of the maximal diameter of total myomas removed than the RMP group. After propensity score matching, the total operative time (RSS: 150.9 ± 57.1 min vs. RMP: 170 ± 74.5 min, p = 0.0296) was significantly shorter in the RSS group. The RSS group tended to have a longer docking time (RSS: 9.8 ± 6.5 min vs. RMP: 8 ± 6.2 min, p = 0.0527), shorter console time (RSS: 111.1 ± 52.3 min vs. RMP: 125.8 ± 65.1 min, p = 0.0665), and shorter time required for in-bag morcellation (RSS: 30.1 ± 17.2 min vs. RMP: 36.2 ± 25.7 min, p = 0.0684). The visual analog scale pain score 1 day postoperatively was significantly lower in the RSS group (RSS: 2.4 ± 0.8 days vs. RMP: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.0149), with similar consumption of analgesic drugs. The rate of transfusion, estimated blood loss during the operation, and length of hospital stay were not different between the two modalities. No other noticeable complications were observed in either group. Conclusions: Da Vinci RSS myomectomy is a compatible option with regard to reproducibility and safety, without significantly compromising the number and sum of the maximal diameter of myomas removed. The advantage of shorter total operative time and less pain with the same amount of analgesic drugs in RSS myomectomy will contribute to improving patient satisfaction.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHCase-Control Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy*-
dc.subject.MESHLeiomyoma* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHOperative Time-
dc.subject.MESHPregnancy-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures*-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Myomectomy* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.titleRobotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSo Hyun Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hyun Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Rim Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSiHyun Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeongjee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok Kyo Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Sik Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Seok Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9-
dc.contributor.localIdA01668-
dc.contributor.localIdA01888-
dc.contributor.localIdA05905-
dc.contributor.localIdA05996-
dc.contributor.localIdA02795-
dc.contributor.localIdA03846-
dc.contributor.localIdA04114-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00377-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2482-
dc.identifier.pmid34044817-
dc.subject.keywordComparative study-
dc.subject.keywordMinimally invasive surgery-
dc.subject.keywordRobot myomectomy-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic multi-port myomectomy-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic single-site myomectomy-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Joo Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박주현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서석교-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안소현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이명지-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이병석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조시현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최영식-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage264-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC SURGERY, Vol.21(1) : 264, 2021-05-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.