572 680

Cited 25 times in

Cited 10 times in

Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKo, Heejoo-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Won Hee-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Chirag-
dc.contributor.authorShim, Jin Sup (Andy)-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorBaek, Jong Geol-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ryeong Hwang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T05:33:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-29T05:33:35Z-
dc.date.created2021-07-06-
dc.date.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/185098-
dc.description.abstractPurpose How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. Methods Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values Results Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5-6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). Conclusions Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation-
dc.relation.isPartOfFRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY-
dc.relation.isPartOfFRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Heejoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Won Hee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShah, Chirag-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShim, Jin Sup (Andy)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBaek, Jong Geol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Ryeong Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2021.645328-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03512-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-943X-
dc.subject.keywordbreast neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordcontinuous positive airway pressure-
dc.subject.keywordproton therapy-
dc.subject.keywordradiotherapy-
dc.subject.keywordintensity-modulated-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorMoon, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Won Hee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBaek, Jong Geol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Ryeong Hwang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85104932217-
dc.identifier.wosid000643720200001-
dc.citation.volume11-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, Vol.11, 2021-04-
dc.identifier.rimsid70620-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbreast neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcontinuous positive airway pressure-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorproton therapy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorradiotherapy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorintensity-modulated-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRADIOTHERAPY-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOncology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOncology-
dc.identifier.articleno645328-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.