678 857

Cited 0 times in

Cited 13 times in

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement between Self-Expanding versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yong Joon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung Jun-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sung Jin-
dc.contributor.authorShim, Chi Young-
dc.contributor.authorAhn , Chul Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Geu Ru-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T17:14:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-29T17:14:34Z-
dc.date.created2022-04-11-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.issn1738-5520-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182246-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported as a good alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus. Head-to-head comparisons of different transcatheter aortic valves in these patients are insufficient. We compared the outcomes after TAVR between two different types of recent transcatheter aortic valves (self-expanding vs. balloon-expandable) in patients with small aortic annulus. Methods: A total of 70 patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annulus (mean diameter <= 23 mm or minimal diameter <= 21 mm on computed tomography) underwent TAVR with either a self-expanding valve with supra-annular location (n=45) or a balloon-expandable valve with intra-annular location (n=25). The echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters after TAVR and 1-year follow-up were compared. Results: Between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the clinical outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation (11.1% vs. 8.0%), acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 (4.4% vs. 4.0%), and major vascular complication (4.4% vs. 0.0%) were similar without all-cause mortality, stroke, and life-threatening bleeding during 30-day follow-up. Compared with the balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the self-expanding valve-treated patients presented larger effective orifice area (EOA) (1.46 +/- 0.28 vs. 1.75 +/- 0.42 cm(2), p=0.002) and indexed EOA (0.95 +/- 0.21 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.28 cm(2)/m(2), p=0.001), whereas mean aortic valve gradient (11.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 8.9 +/- 5.2 mmHg, P=0.005) and incidence of >= moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch (36.0% vs. 8.9%, p=0.009) were lower. These hemodynamic differences were maintained at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: TAVR with self-expanding valves was associated with superior hemodynamic outcomes compared with balloon-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annulus.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish, Korean-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Circulation-
dc.relation.isPartOfKorean Circulation Journal-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleComparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement between Self-Expanding versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Yong Joon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Seung Jun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Sung Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShim, Chi Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn , Chul Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Geu Ru-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.identifier.doi10.4070/kcj.2020.0409-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01952-
dc.identifier.eissn1738-5555-
dc.subject.keywordTranscatheter aortic valve replacement-
dc.subject.keywordAortic valve stenosis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Seung Jun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Sung Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShim, Chi Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorAhn , Chul Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Geu Ru-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85099983453-
dc.identifier.wosid000624292700003-
dc.citation.volume51-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage222-
dc.citation.endPage231-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKorean Circulation Journal, Vol.51(3) : 222-231, 2021-03-
dc.identifier.rimsid73163-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTranscatheter aortic valve replacement-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAortic valve stenosis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTENOSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPLANTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEMODYNAMICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACT-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002686666-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaCardiovascular System & Cardiology-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.