411 559

Cited 7 times in

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement between Self-Expanding versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author고영국-
dc.contributor.author김병극-
dc.contributor.author김중선-
dc.contributor.author심지영-
dc.contributor.author안철민-
dc.contributor.author이승준-
dc.contributor.author이용준-
dc.contributor.author장양수-
dc.contributor.author최동훈-
dc.contributor.author홍그루-
dc.contributor.author홍명기-
dc.contributor.author홍성진-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T17:14:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-29T17:14:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.issn1738-5520-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182246-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported as a good alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus. Head-to-head comparisons of different transcatheter aortic valves in these patients are insufficient. We compared the outcomes after TAVR between two different types of recent transcatheter aortic valves (self-expanding vs. balloon-expandable) in patients with small aortic annulus. Methods: A total of 70 patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annulus (mean diameter ≤23 mm or minimal diameter ≤21 mm on computed tomography) underwent TAVR with either a self-expanding valve with supra-annular location (n=45) or a balloon-expandable valve with intra-annular location (n=25). The echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters after TAVR and 1-year follow-up were compared. Results: Between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the clinical outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation (11.1% vs. 8.0%), acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 (4.4% vs. 4.0%), and major vascular complication (4.4% vs. 0.0%) were similar without all-cause mortality, stroke, and life-threatening bleeding during 30-day follow-up. Compared with the balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the self-expanding valve-treated patients presented larger effective orifice area (EOA) (1.46±0.28 vs. 1.75±0.42 cm², p=0.002) and indexed EOA (0.95±0.21 vs. 1.18±0.28 cm²/m², p=0.001), whereas mean aortic valve gradient (11.7±2.9 vs. 8.9±5.2 mmHg, P=0.005) and incidence of ≥moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch (36.0% vs. 8.9%, p=0.009) were lower. These hemodynamic differences were maintained at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: TAVR with self-expanding valves was associated with superior hemodynamic outcomes compared with balloon-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annulus.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish, Korean-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Circulation-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleComparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement between Self-Expanding versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Joon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Jun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Jin Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChi Young Shim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChul Min Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByeong Keuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGeu Ru Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Guk Ko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDonghoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYangsoo Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong Ki Hong-
dc.identifier.doi10.4070/kcj.2020.0409-
dc.contributor.localIdA00127-
dc.contributor.localIdA00493-
dc.contributor.localIdA00961-
dc.contributor.localIdA02213-
dc.contributor.localIdA02269-
dc.contributor.localIdA02927-
dc.contributor.localIdA02984-
dc.contributor.localIdA03448-
dc.contributor.localIdA04053-
dc.contributor.localIdA04386-
dc.contributor.localIdA04391-
dc.contributor.localIdA04403-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01952-
dc.identifier.eissn1738-5555-
dc.identifier.pmid33655721-
dc.subject.keywordAortic valve stenosis-
dc.subject.keywordTranscatheter aortic valve replacement-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor고영국-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김병극-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김중선-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor심지영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안철민-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이승준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이용준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor장양수-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최동훈-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor홍그루-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor홍명기-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor홍성진-
dc.citation.volume51-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage222-
dc.citation.endPage231-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, Vol.51(3) : 222-231, 2021-03-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.