128 379

Cited 6 times in

Differences in perspectives of pediatricians on advance care planning: a cross-sectional survey

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author송인규-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-16T06:37:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-16T06:37:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/179862-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The increase in the number of pediatric patients with complex health conditions necessitates the application of advance care planning for children. Earlier, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was taboo in the medical society in South Korea due to the history of such practice being punishable by law, and physicians tended to pursue aggressive treatment. With changes in public opinion on end-of-life care, the Korean government enacted a new law that protect human dignity by respecting patients' self-determination and facilitating advance care planning. However, little is known about current state of advance care planning for pediatric patients. The study aimed to assess perceptions regarding advance care planning among South Korean pediatricians and clarify any differences in perception among pediatric subspecialties. Methods: This study was an observational cross-sectional survey that used a web-based self-report questionnaire. Participants comprised of pediatricians currently caring for children with life-limiting conditions in 2018. Results: Of the 96 respondents, 89 were included in the analysis. In a hypothetical patient scenario, more hemato-oncologists and intensivists than neonatologists and neurologists preferred to provide comfort care than aggressive treatment. While 72.2% of hemato-oncologists reported that they usually or always discuss advance care plans with parents during treatment, more than half of other pediatricians reported that they seldom do so. Furthermore, 65% of respondents said that they never discuss advance care planning with adolescent patients. Moreover, there were no notable differences among subspecialties. The most prevalent answers to factors impeding advance care planning were lack of systemic support after performing advance care planning (82.0%) and uncertain legal responsibilities (70.8%). Conclusions: The pediatricians differed in their experiences and attitudes toward advance care planning based on their subspecialty. Consequently, institutional support and education should be provided to physicians so that they can include children and families in discussions on prognosis.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC PALLIATIVE CARE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDifferences in perspectives of pediatricians on advance care planning: a cross-sectional survey-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Pediatrics (소아청소년과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Gyu Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Han Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi Ji Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12904-020-00652-8-
dc.contributor.localIdA05962-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03600-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-684X-
dc.identifier.pmid32948177-
dc.subject.keywordAdvance care planning-
dc.subject.keywordPalliative care-
dc.subject.keywordPediatrician-
dc.subject.keywordPrognosis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSong, In Gyu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor송인규-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage145-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC PALLIATIVE CARE, Vol.19(1) : 145, 2020-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pediatrics (소아과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.