0 674

Cited 21 times in

Cited 25 times in

Detailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jihun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eungman-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kwangwoo-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kyung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Chae-Seon-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T01:09:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-29T01:09:29Z-
dc.date.created2021-03-18-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.issn1120-1797-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/179416-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To perform a detailed evaluation of dose calculation accuracy and clinical feasibility of Mobius3D. Of particular importance, multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling accuracy in the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm was investigated. Methods: Mobius3D was fully commissioned by following the vendor-suggested procedures, including dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. The DLG optimization determined an optimal DLG correction factor which minimized the average difference between calculated and measured doses for 13 patient volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Two sets of step-and-shoot plans were created to examine MLC and off-axis open fields modeling accuracy of the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm: MLC test set and off-axis open field test set. The WA plans were delivered to MapCHECK for the MLC tests and an ionization chamber for the off-axis open field test, and these measured doses were compared to Mobius3D-calculated doses. Results: The mean difference between the calculated and measured doses across the 13 VMAT plans was 0.6% with an optimal DLG correction factor of 1.0. The mean percentage of pixels passing gamma from a 3%/1 mm gamma analysis for the MLC WA set was 43.5% across the MLC tests. For the off-axis open field tests, the Mobius3D-calculated dose for 1.5 cm square field was - 4.6% lower than the chamber-measured dose. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that Mobius3D has dose calculation uncertainties for small fields and MLC tongue-and-groove design is not adequately taken into consideration in Mobius3D. Careful consideration of DLG correction factor, which affects the resulting dose distributions, is required when commissioning Mobius3D for patient-specific QA.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIstituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali-
dc.relation.isPartOfPHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS-
dc.relation.isPartOfPHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDetailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jihun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Eungman-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Kwangwoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang, Kyung Hwan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Dong Wook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Chae-Seon-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.015-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02892-
dc.identifier.eissn1724-191X-
dc.subject.keywordMobius3D-
dc.subject.keywordPatient-specific quality assurance-
dc.subject.keywordMultileaf collimator modeling-
dc.subject.keywordAccuracy evaluation-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Kwang Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jihun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Min Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Kwangwoo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChang, Kyung Hwan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dong Wook-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jin Sung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Chae-Seon-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85085300713-
dc.identifier.wosid000537810100015-
dc.citation.volume74-
dc.citation.startPage125-
dc.citation.endPage132-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, Vol.74 : 125-132, 2020-06-
dc.identifier.rimsid69274-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMobius3D-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPatient-specific quality assurance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMultileaf collimator modeling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAccuracy evaluation-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-ASSURANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOSIMETRY SYSTEM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEPID DOSIMETRY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAGILITY MLC-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLOG FILES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHANTOM-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.