0 397

Cited 156 times in

Lack of difference among terlipressin, somatostatin, and octreotide in the control of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박준용-
dc.contributor.author한광협-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T16:42:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-27T16:42:31Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-
dc.identifier.issn0270-9139-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/178472-
dc.description.abstractVasoactive drugs are recommended to be started as soon as possible in suspected variceal bleeding, even before diagnostic endoscopy. However, it is still unclear whether the therapeutic efficacies of the various vasoactive drugs used are comparable. The aim of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was to characterize the effects of terlipressin, somatostatin, and octreotide when they are initiated before endoscopic treatment in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Patients with liver cirrhosis and significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomly assigned to receive early administration of terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide, followed by endoscopic treatment. Patients with nonvariceal bleeding were excluded after endoscopy. The primary endpoint was 5-day treatment success, defined as control of bleeding without rescue treatment, rebleeding, or mortality, with a noninferiority margin of 0.1. In total, 780 patients with variceal bleeding were enrolled: 261 in the terlipressin group; 259 in the somatostatin group; and 260 in the octreotide group. At the time of initial endoscopy, active bleeding was noted in 43.7%, 44.4%, and 43.5% of these patients, respectively (P=0.748), and treatment success was achieved by day 5 in 86.2%, 83.4%, and 83.8% (P=0.636), with similar rates of control of bleeding without rescue treatment (89.7%, 87.6%, and 88.1%; P=0.752), rebleeding (3.4%, 4.8%, and 4.4%; P=0.739), or mortality (8.0%, 8.9%, and 8.8%; P=0.929). The absolute values of the lower bound of confidence intervals for terlipressin versus somatostatin, terlilpressin versus octreotide, and octreotide versus somatostatin were 0.095, 0.090, and 0.065, respectively. Conclusion: Hemostatic effects and safety did not differ significantly between terlipressin, somatostatin, and octreotide as adjuvants to endoscopic treatment in patients with acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.isPartOfHEPATOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAcute Disease-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopy, Gastrointestinal-
dc.subject.MESHEsophageal and Gastric Varices / complications-
dc.subject.MESHEsophageal and Gastric Varices / drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGastrointestinal Hemorrhage / drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHGastrointestinal Hemorrhage / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHHemostasis / drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHHemostasis / physiology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLypressin / analogs & derivatives*-
dc.subject.MESHLypressin / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHOctreotide / therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSomatostatin / therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHTerlipressin-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Failure-
dc.subject.MESHVasoconstrictor Agents / therapeutic use*-
dc.titleLack of difference among terlipressin, somatostatin, and octreotide in the control of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeon Seok Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo Young Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Yong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyung Joon Yim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByoung Kuk Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaeho Hahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Ik Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Heo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyonggin An-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Young Tak-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Koo Baik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwang Hyub Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Seok Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Hoon Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMong Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Ho Um-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hep.27006-
dc.contributor.localIdA01675-
dc.contributor.localIdA04268-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00985-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-3350-
dc.identifier.pmid24415445-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hep.27006-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Jun Yong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박준용-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한광협-
dc.citation.volume60-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage954-
dc.citation.endPage963-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHEPATOLOGY, Vol.60(3) : 954-963, 2014-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.