80 226

Cited 0 times in

동결 건조된 동종골의 혼합이식을 이용한 요추 후외방 유합술의 유용성

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이환모-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T17:40:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-02T17:40:52Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.issn1229-5701-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/176975-
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was made of patients undergoing posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with commercially available allogeneic bone graft with those patients in a similar consecutive control group who underwent posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with autogenic bone graft and to determine whether the commercially available allogeneic bone is useful for postero-lateral fusion of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Major differences exist in the ability of an allogeneic bone graft to regenerate a viable cellular network as compared to an autogenic bone graft. This is related to the immunologic response of the host to the foreign bone. The fusion rate of deep freezing allogeneic bone graft was reported as 80-100%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with spondylolisthesis treated with decompression, fixation with pedicle screws and posterolateral fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Nineteen patients (group 1) were treated with commercially available allogeneic bone (Tutoplast) graft mixed with autogenic bone and the remaining 60 patients (group 2) were treated with autogenic bone graft. Operating time, amount of transfusion, duration of hospital stay, symptom improvement, fusion rate, duration of fusion, and complications were studied. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of duration of hospital stay, amount of transfusion, symptom improvement, and complications . However, there were significant differences between the allogeneic and autogenic groups in terms of operating time (212.3 versus 230.9 minutes), fusion rate (36.8% versus 98.3%), and duration of fusion (10.2 versus 6.4 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available allogeneic bone is less useful for posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.publisher대한척추외과학회-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery (대한척추외과학회지)-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.title동결 건조된 동종골의 혼합이식을 이용한 요추 후외방 유합술의 유용성-
dc.title.alternativeUsefulness of Posterolateral Fusion of Lumbar Spine with Allogeneic Bone (Tutoplast)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김남현-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이환모-
dc.contributor.googleauthor석경수-
dc.contributor.localIdA03333-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01550-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Hwan Mo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이환모-
dc.citation.volume5-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage198-
dc.citation.endPage204-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery (대한척추외과학회지), Vol.5(2) : 198-204, 1998-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.