0 341

Cited 84 times in

Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이진우-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07T08:44:33Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-07T08:44:33Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/173800-
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: Clinical and radiographic results were assessed in adult patients who had undergone operation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with those of transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. BACKGROUND DATA: Successful clinical results after fusion can be expected in adolescents, but the adult type differs in that stability through fusion alone fails to ensure satisfactory outcomes. The role of decompression in the surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Anterior interbody fusion has an indirect effect of nerve root decompression through widening of the intervertebral space, whereas posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation provides direct decompression. METHODS: The clinical data of 40 adult patients who had undergone operations for isthmic spondylolithesis from June 1977 through June 1994 were reviewed. Anterior interbody fusion was performed in 20 patients (Group I) and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation in 20 patients (Group II). The mean age of Group I was 44.1 years (range, 21-62 years), and that of Group II was 41.3 years (range, 21-57 years). Group I contained B men and 12 women, Group II contained 5 men and 15 women. The symptoms and signs in Groups I and II were similar. The duration of follow-up averaged 3.6 years (range, 1.1-16 years) in Group I and 2.3 years (range, 1.1-6 years) in Group II. RESULTS: The anterior slippage in Group I, assessed by the Taillard method, was 16.1% and was corrected to 10.4% after surgery. Anterior slippage in Group II was 15.2% and was corrected to 9.8% after surgery. The fusion rate 12 months after surgery was 90% in Group I and 95% in Group II. The clinical results were analyzed by Kim's criteria, according to variables on the improvement of clinical symptoms. Satisfactory results were obtained in 85% of Group I and 90% of Group II. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults (P < 0.05).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfSPINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHDecompression, Surgical/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHDecompression, Surgical/methods-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInternal Fixators-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHLumbar Vertebrae*/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHLumbar Vertebrae*/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.MESHRadiography-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSciatica/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHSciatica/etiology-
dc.subject.MESHSciatica/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHSpinal Fusion/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHSpinal Fusion/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHSpondylolisthesis/complications-
dc.subject.MESHSpondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHSpondylolisthesis/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleAnterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Nam Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jin Woo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00007632-199904150-00014-
dc.contributor.localIdA03230-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02674-
dc.identifier.eissn1528-1159-
dc.identifier.pmid10222534-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00007632-199904150-00014&LSLINK=80&D=ovft-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Jin Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이진우-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage812-
dc.citation.endPage816-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSPINE, Vol.24(8) : 812-816, 1999-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.