Cited 14 times in
Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 송찬일 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-18T00:35:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-18T00:35:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0385-8146 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/173125 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and compare it with conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty in terms of success rate and hearing outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 35 patients (36 ears) who underwent butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty (inlay group, 23 ears of 22 patients) or conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty (underlay group, 13 ears). The anatomical success rate and hearing outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Re-perforation occurred in 2 cases (8.7%) in the inlay group and 3 (23.1%) in the underlay group. One patient in the inlay group developed a serious infection, and one in the underlay group developed massive granulation of the tympanic membrane. In the inlay group, the air-bone gap (ABG) decreased from 19.9 (±12.6) dB HL preoperatively to 13.8 (±11.3) dB HL postoperatively (p=0.047), in the underlay group, it decreased from 23.5 (±15.8) dB HL to 18.3 (±20.6) dB HL. Regarding improvement in ABG, the difference between the group was not statistically significant (p=0.968). CONCLUSION: Butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty is comparable with conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty in both anatomic and audiological success rates. Owing to its simplicity, shorter operation time, and rapid patient recovery, butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty could be considered a favourable surgical option. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | restriction | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | AURIS NASUS LARYNX | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.title | Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology (이비인후과학교실) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Min Bum Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jin-A. Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Michelle J. Suh | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chan Il Song | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.anl.2018.07.001 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A05643 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J00263 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-1476 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30017235 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814618303067 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Butterfly | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Cartilage tympanoplasty | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Conductive hearing loss | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Tympanic membrane perforation | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Song, Chan Il | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 송찬일 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 167 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 171 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | AURIS NASUS LARYNX, Vol.46(2) : 167-171, 2019 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.