0 335

Cited 31 times in

Comparison of 1-and 2-Incision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김성재-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-11T05:02:18Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-11T05:02:18Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.issn0749-8063-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171559-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the results of the 1-incision technique and the conventional 2- incision technique for the arthroscopic treatment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. The 2-incision technique was performed in 10 patients (group I) and the 1-incision technique in 45 patients (group II). The average duration of follow-up was 45 months in group I and 36 months in group II. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts were used for all patients in group I. In group II, 34 BTB autografts and 11 BTB allografts were used. Postoperative Lysholm mean values were 90.0 in group I and 90.6 in group II. HSS mean values were 87.7 in group I and 92.6 in group II (P = .037). The Tegner activity level scales were 6.4 in group I and 6.5 in group II. The average side-to-side difference of the corrected posterior translation measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer were 2.10 mm in group I and 2.38 mm in group II. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative mean values except HSS scores. The arthroscopic PCL reconstruction using the 1-incision technique showed good results comparable with the conventional 2-incision technique. This technique needs no another incision or dissection over the medial femoral condyle.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders Co.-
dc.relation.isPartOfArthroscopy - the Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHArthroscopy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGraft Survival-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKnee Injuries/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHKnee Injuries/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHLigaments, Articular/transplantation-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPosterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHPosterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries-
dc.subject.MESHPosterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRadiography-
dc.subject.MESHRange of Motion, Articular-
dc.subject.MESHReconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHTransplantation, Autologous-
dc.subject.MESHTransplantation, Homologous-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleComparison of 1-and 2-Incision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung-Jae Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Jin Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Kon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun-Seop Jahng-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan-Sik Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0749-8063(00)90051-3-
dc.contributor.localIdA00583-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00242-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-3231-
dc.identifier.pmid10750007-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806300900513-
dc.subject.keywordPosterior cruciate ligament-
dc.subject.keywordArthroscopy-
dc.subject.keywordReconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordOne-incision-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sung Jae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김성재-
dc.citation.volume16-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage268-
dc.citation.endPage278-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationArthroscopy - the Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol.16(3) : 268-278, 2000-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.