477 709

Cited 5 times in

External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author구자승-
dc.contributor.author금기창-
dc.contributor.author김건민-
dc.contributor.author김용배-
dc.contributor.author김지예-
dc.contributor.author박세호-
dc.contributor.author박형석-
dc.contributor.author서창옥-
dc.contributor.author손주혁-
dc.contributor.author장지석-
dc.contributor.author조영업-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T07:22:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-20T07:22:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2234-1900-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/170852-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. Materials and. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%-5%, 5%-10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. Conclusions: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfRadiation Oncology Journal-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleExternal validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Pathology (병리학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Min Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Suk Chang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Up Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeho Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyung Seok Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Ye Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hyuk Sohn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGun Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJa Seung Koo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Chang Keum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang-Ok Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Bae Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3857/roj.2018.00059-
dc.contributor.localIdA00198-
dc.contributor.localIdA00272-
dc.contributor.localIdA00287-
dc.contributor.localIdA00744-
dc.contributor.localIdA00984-
dc.contributor.localIdA01524-
dc.contributor.localIdA01753-
dc.contributor.localIdA01919-
dc.contributor.localIdA01995-
dc.contributor.localIdA04658-
dc.contributor.localIdA05420-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02592-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-3164-
dc.identifier.pmid29983034-
dc.subject.keywordRadiotherapy-
dc.subject.keywordRecurrence-
dc.subject.keywordValidation-
dc.subject.keywordBreast conservation therapy-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoo, Ja Seung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor구자승-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor금기창-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김건민-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김용배-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김지예-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박세호-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박형석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서창옥-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor손주혁-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor장지석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조영업-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage139-
dc.citation.endPage146-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRadiation Oncology Journal, Vol.36(2) : 139-146, 2018-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.