0 461

Cited 68 times in

Mediation of the Relationship Between Endovascular Therapy and Functional Outcome by Follow-up Infarct Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author허지회-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T05:13:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-29T05:13:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2168-6149-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/169467-
dc.description.abstractImportance: The positive treatment effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) is assumed to be caused by the preservation of brain tissue. It remains unclear to what extent the treatment-related reduction in follow-up infarct volume (FIV) explains the improved functional outcome after EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Objective: To study whether FIV mediates the relationship between EVT and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patient data from 7 randomized multicenter trials were pooled. These trials were conducted between December 2010 and April 2015 and included 1764 patients randomly assigned to receive either EVT or standard care (control). Follow-up infarct volume was assessed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging after stroke onset. Mediation analysis was performed to examine the potential causal chain in which FIV may mediate the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. A total of 1690 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five additional patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 1665 patients, including 821 (49.3%) in the EVT group and 844 (50.7%) in the control group. Data were analyzed from January to June 2017. Main Outcome and Measure: The 90-day functional outcome via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: Among 1665 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 68 (57-76) years, and 781 (46.9%) were female. The median (IQR) time to FIV measurement was 30 (24-237) hours. The median (IQR) FIV was 41 (14-120) mL. Patients in the EVT group had significantly smaller FIVs compared with patients in the control group (median [IQR] FIV, 33 [11-99] vs 51 [18-134] mL; P = .007) and lower mRS scores at 90 days (median [IQR] score, 3 [1-4] vs 4 [2-5]). Follow-up infarct volume was a predictor of functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54; P < .001). Follow-up infarct volume partially mediated the relationship between treatment type with mRS score, as EVT was still significantly associated with functional outcome after adjustment for FIV (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.52-3.21; P < .001). Treatment-reduced FIV explained 12% (95% CI, 1-19) of the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis, follow-up infarct volume predicted functional outcome; however, a reduced infarct volume after treatment with EVT only explained 12% of the treatment benefit. Follow-up infarct volume as measured on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is not a valid proxy for estimating treatment effect in phase II and III trials of acute ischemic stroke.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association-
dc.relation.isPartOfJAMA NEUROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleMediation of the Relationship Between Endovascular Therapy and Functional Outcome by Follow-up Infarct Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Neurology (신경과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAnna M. M. Boers-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIvo G. H. Jansen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorScott Brown-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHester F. Lingsma-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLudo F. M. Beenen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThomas G. Devlin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuis San Román-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Hoe Heo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarc Ribó-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMohammed A. Almekhlafi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid S. Liebeskind-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeanne Teitelbaum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPatricia Cuadras-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRichard du Mesnil de Rochemont-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarine Beaumont-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMartin M. Brown-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlbert J. Yoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGeoffrey A. Donnan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJean Louis Mas-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCatherine Oppenheim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRichard J. Dowling-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThierry Moulin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNelly Agrinier-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDemetrius K. Lopes-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLucía Aja Rodríguez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKars C. J. Compagne-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFahad S. Al-Ajlan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeremy Madigan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGregory W. Albers-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSebastien Soize-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJordi Blasco-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStephen M. Davis-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRaul G. Nogueira-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAntoni Dávalos-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBijoy K. Menon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAad van der Lugt-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKeith W. Muir-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYvo B. W. E. M. Roos-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPhil White-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPeter J. Mitchell-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrew M. Demchuk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWim H. van Zwam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTudor G. Jovin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRobert J. van Oostenbrugge-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDiederik W. J. Dippel-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBruce C. V. Campbell-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFrancis Guillemin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSerge Bracard-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMichael D. Hill-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMayank Goyal-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHenk A. Marquering-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCharles B. L. M. Majoie-
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3661-
dc.contributor.localIdA04369-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01199-
dc.identifier.eissn2168-6157-
dc.identifier.pmid30615038-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2719698-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHeo, Ji Hoe-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor허지회-
dc.citation.volume76-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage194-
dc.citation.endPage202-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAMA NEUROLOGY, Vol.76(2) : 194-202, 2019-
dc.identifier.rimsid62740-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurology (신경과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.