329 453

Cited 8 times in

Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: current status and new approaches

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author손태일-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.contributor.author김형일-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T16:56:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-03T16:56:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165990-
dc.description.abstractSurgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro® multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site® system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.relation.isPartOfTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleRobotic surgery for gastric tumor: current status and new approaches-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Hyun Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHae Min Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaeil Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jin Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyoung-Il Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21-
dc.contributor.localIdA01998-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.contributor.localIdA01154-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03543-
dc.identifier.pmid28138595-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic surgery-
dc.subject.keywordfeasibility-
dc.subject.keywordfluorescence imaging-
dc.subject.keywordgastrectomy-
dc.subject.keywordlearning curve-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor손태일-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor형우진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김형일-
dc.citation.volume1-
dc.citation.startPage28-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol.1 : 28, 2016-
dc.identifier.rimsid57869-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.