Cited 67 times in
Ramucirumab as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of REACH Trial Results by Child-Pugh Score
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 조재용 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-23T10:53:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-23T10:53:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2374-2437 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165782 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Importance: REACH is the first phase 3 trial to provide information on hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in the second-line (postsorafenib) setting categorized by Child-Pugh score, a scoring system used to measure the severity of chronic liver disease. This exploratory analysis demonstrates the relationship between a potential ramucirumab survival benefit, severity of liver disease, and baseline α-fetoprotein (αFP). Objective: To assess treatment effects and tolerability of ramucirumab by Child-Pugh score in patients with HCC enrolled in the REACH trial. Design, Settings, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care vs placebo and best supportive care as second-line treatment in patients with HCC enrolled between November 4, 2010 and April 18, 2013, from 154 global sites. Overall, 643 patients were randomized and included in this analysis; 565 patients considered Child-Pugh class A (Child-Pugh scores 5 and 6) and 78 patients considered class B (Child-Pugh scores 7 and 8). Interventions: Ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously plus best supportive care every 2 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS), defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Results: In the randomized population of 643 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [11.1] years) in this analysis, a potential ramucirumab OS benefit was observed for patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.02; P = .06) but no apparent benefit for patients with Child-Pugh scores of 6 or 7 and 8. In patients with baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL (to convert ng/mL to μg/L, multiply by 1.0) or more, a ramucirumab OS benefit was significant for a score of Child-Pugh 5 (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.87; P = .01) and Child-Pugh 6 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98; P = .04), but was not significant for Child-Pugh 7 and 8. The overall safety profile of ramucirumab, regardless of Child-Pugh score, was considered manageable. Regardless of treatment arm, patients with Child-Pugh scores of 7 and 8 experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events, including ascites and asthenia, and special-interest events, including liver injury and/or failure and bleeding, compared with patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5 or 6. Conclusions and Relevance: In unselected patients, a trend for ramucirumab survival benefit was observed only for patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5. In patients with baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL or more, a ramucirumab survival benefit was observed for Child-Pugh scores of 5 and 6. Ramucirumab had a manageable toxic effect profile. These results support the ongoing REACH-2 study of ramucirumab in patients with advanced HCC with underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL or more. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01140347. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | American Medical Association | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JAMA ONCOLOGY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.title | Ramucirumab as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of REACH Trial Results by Child-Pugh Score | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Andrew X. Zhu | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ari David Baron | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Peter Malfertheiner | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Masatoshi Kudo | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seiji Kawazoe | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Denis Pezet | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Florian Weissinger | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Giovanni Brandi | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Carlo A. Barone | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Takuji Okusaka | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yoshiyuki Wada | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Joon Oh Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Baek-Yeol Ryoo | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jae Yong Cho | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyun Cheol Chung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chung-Pin Li | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chia-Jui Yen | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kuan-Der Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Shao-Chun Chang | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ling Yang | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Paolo B. Abada | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ian Chau | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4115 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03899 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J02919 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2374-2445 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27657674 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2553753 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Cho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 조재용 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 3 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 235 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 243 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JAMA ONCOLOGY, Vol.3(2) : 235-243, 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 60360 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.