0 661

Cited 228 times in

Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author조재용-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:53:07Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:53:07Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165778-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Gastric cancer cell lines, particularly those with low levels of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key activator of DNA damage response, are sensitive to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We compared the efficacy of olaparib plus paclitaxel (olaparib/paclitaxel) with paclitaxel alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer and assessed whether low ATM expression is predictive of improved clinical outcome for olaparib/paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II, double-blind study (Study 39; NCT01063517), patients were randomly assigned to oral olaparib 100 mg twice per day (tablets) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) per day intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle) or placebo plus paclitaxel (placebo/paclitaxel), followed by maintenance monotherapy with olaparib (200 mg twice per day) or placebo. The study population was enriched to 50% for patients with low or undetectable ATM levels (ATMlow). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three of 124 randomly assigned patients received treatment (olaparib/paclitaxel, n = 61; placebo/paclitaxel, n = 62). The screening prevalence of ATMlow patients was 14%. Olaparib/paclitaxel did not lead to a significant improvement in PFS versus placebo/paclitaxel (overall population: hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; median PFS, 3.91 v 3.55 months, respectively; ATMlow population: HR, 0.74; median PFS, 5.29 v 3.68 months, respectively). However, olaparib/paclitaxel significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo/paclitaxel in both the overall population (HR, 0.56; 80% CI, 0.41 to 0.75; P = .005; median OS, 13.1 v 8.3 months, respectively) and the ATMlow population (HR, 0.35; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.56; P = .002; median OS, not reached v 8.2 months, respectively). Olaparib/paclitaxel was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSION: Olaparib/paclitaxel is active in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, with a greater OS benefit in ATMlow patients. A phase III trial in this setting is under way.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleRandomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYung-Jue Bang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeock-Ah Im-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKeun-Wook Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Yong Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kee Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Hee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeul Hong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoon Oh Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHoo Geun Chun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Young Zang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAnitra Fielding-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJacqui Rowbottom-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDarren Hodgson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMark J. O'Connor-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXiaolu Yin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Ho Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0320-
dc.contributor.localIdA03899-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid26282658-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0320-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong::Cho, Jae Yong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조재용-
dc.citation.volume33-
dc.citation.number33-
dc.citation.startPage3858-
dc.citation.endPage3865-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.33(33) : 3858-3865, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid60357-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.