188 383

Cited 4 times in

Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이은직-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T16:42:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-19T16:42:15Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165611-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Current criterion of waist circumference (WC) for abdominal obesity is not enough to demonstrate characteristics of obese and non-obese populations defined by BMI. The aim of this study was to redefine the cutoff values of WC according to general obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)). METHODS: The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis according to BMI in 1,063 non-diabetic subjects. To validate this new criterion, diabetic patients (n = 3,690) were divided into three groups based on the current (WC of 90/80 cm for men/women) and new cutoff values of WC: 1) group with WC below the lowest value of two criteria; 2) intermediate group defined as having a WC between them; and 3) group with WC more than the highest value of them. RESULTS: The new cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis in non-diabetic subjects were 84/76 cm for non-obese men/women, and 93/87 cm for obese men/women, respectively. Of non-obese diabetic patients, the intermediate group (WC 84 ~ 90/76 ~ 80 cm for men/women) was more insulin resistant and showed elevated odds ratio (OR) for having 2 or more metabolic risk factors compared to group with WC below 84/76 cm for men/women [OR 2.48 (95 % CI 1.89-3.25) in men, 2.01 (95% CI 1.45-2.78) in women]. In contrast, among obese diabetic patients, insulin resistance and the likelihood of having 2 or more metabolic risk factors were not different from the intermediate group (WC 90 ~ 93/80 ~ 87 cm for men/women) and group with WC below 90/80 cm for men/women. CONCLUSIONS: The current universal cutoff values of WC may under- or over-estimate the metabolic risks of intermediate groups. Therefore, the WC criteria for abdominal obesity should be applied differently depending on the BMI.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfNUTRITION & METABOLISM-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleReappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung-Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Ju Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Ju Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Wook Huh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok Won Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Jig Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong-Wook Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKap-Bum Huh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y-
dc.contributor.localIdA03050-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03094-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-7075-
dc.identifier.pmid27051457-
dc.subject.keywordAbdominal obesity-
dc.subject.keywordObesity-
dc.subject.keywordWaist circumference-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Eun Jig-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이은직-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.startPage26-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNUTRITION & METABOLISM, Vol.13 : 26, 2016-
dc.identifier.rimsid59240-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.