Cited 52 times in

Parameters for Predicting Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer Patients: Simple Is Better Than Complex.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김형일-
dc.contributor.author노성훈-
dc.contributor.author서원준-
dc.contributor.author손태일-
dc.contributor.author정재호-
dc.contributor.author조민아-
dc.contributor.author최서희-
dc.contributor.author최윤영-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-16T16:48:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-16T16:48:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165357-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Various parameters are used to predict perioperative surgical outcomes. However, no comprehensive studies in gastrectomy have been conducted. This study aimed to compare the performance of each parameter in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 1032 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. Laboratory values and associated parameters (neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, albumin level, Prognostic Nutritional Index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index) as well as body weight-related data and associated parameters [body mass index (BMI), percentage of weight loss, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 assessment, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, and the Nutritional Risk Index] were measured and calculated. The study end points were major complications, operative mortality, prolonged hospital stay, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male gender, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage gastric cancer, and low albumin level were risk factors for major complications. Old age, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage cancer, and high BMI were risk factors for operative mortality. Old age, open approach, and total gastrectomy were risk factors for prolonged hospital stay. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that old age, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage cancer, and high neutrophil count were unfavorable risk factors for OS. Old age, advanced-stage cancer, high neutrophil count, and high BMI were unfavorable risk factors for RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin level, BMI, and neutrophil count are the most useful parameters for predicting short- and long-term surgical outcomes. Compared with complex parameters, simple-to-measure parameters are better for predicting surgical outcomes for gastric cancer patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleParameters for Predicting Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer Patients: Simple Is Better Than Complex.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAli Guner-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Yong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Eun Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Kyung Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYun Ho Roh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChulkyu Roh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Jun Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMinah Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeohee Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon Young Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaeil Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Ho Cheong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jin Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hoon Noh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyoung-Il Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-018-6684-2-
dc.contributor.localIdA01154-
dc.contributor.localIdA01281-
dc.contributor.localIdA05628-
dc.contributor.localIdA01998-
dc.contributor.localIdA03717-
dc.contributor.localIdA05418-
dc.contributor.localIdA05052-
dc.contributor.localIdA04138-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00179-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.pmid30069658-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-018-6684-2-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hyoung Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSeo, Won Jun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCheong, Jae Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Minah-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Seo Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Yoon Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김형일-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor노성훈-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서원준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor손태일-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정재호-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조민아-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최서희-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최윤영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor형우진-
dc.citation.volume25-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage3239-
dc.citation.endPage3247-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.25(11) : 3239-3247, 2018-
dc.identifier.rimsid58769-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.