0 621

Cited 12 times in

Clinical outcomes of and management strategy for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection of an upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박준철-
dc.contributor.author신성관-
dc.contributor.author이상길-
dc.contributor.author이용찬-
dc.contributor.author정다현-
dc.contributor.author정현수-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-12T05:36:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-12T05:36:42Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/163565-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Perforation is one of the major complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In the present study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of and management strategies for ESD-related perforations. METHODS: Between February 2010 and April 2014, a total of 3821 patients who underwent ESD for an upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm were analyzed using the Yonsei University Severance Hospital database. Clinical outcomes of and management strategies for perforations in 90 patients (2.4 %) were analyzed. The risk factors for the development of perforation were also investigated. RESULTS: The mean age of our subjects was 64.7 ± 12.2 years (male to female ratio, 3.2:1), and the mean size of the resected specimens was 39.4 ± 12.5 mm. Endoscopically visible perforations (visible perforation group) were noted in 74 of the 90 patients (82.2 %), and clinically suspected perforations (suspected perforation group) were noted in 16 patients (17.8 %). Immediate closure with endoclips was attempted in cases with a visible perforation and was successful in 72 (97.3 %) cases. Two patients in whom endoscopic closure failed underwent surgery. Conservative care, including fasting and intravenous antibiotic administration, was attempted in the suspected perforation group, and all the patients were treated successfully without surgery. The mean durations of fasting, antibiotic treatment, and hospital stay were 3.8 ± 3.1, 6.8 ± 4.2, and 8.7 ± 5.3 days, respectively. Subgroup analysis of perforation type (visible perforation vs. suspected perforation) revealed no significant difference in the clinical course. Tumor location at the upper or middle third of the stomach was significantly associated with perforation. CONCLUSION: Most of the ESD-related perforations in upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm could be managed successfully in a non-surgical manner under strict monitoring-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects*-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopy-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIntestinal Perforation/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHIntestinal Perforation/prevention & control-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications/prevention & control-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleClinical outcomes of and management strategy for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection of an upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Ju Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyunsoo Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDa Hyun Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Chul Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Kwan Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Kil Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Chan Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-016-4854-5-
dc.contributor.localIdA02112-
dc.contributor.localIdA01676-
dc.contributor.localIdA02812-
dc.contributor.localIdA02988-
dc.contributor.localIdA03591-
dc.contributor.localIdA03765-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02703-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218-
dc.identifier.pmid26983439-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-016-4854-5-
dc.subject.keywordEndoscopic submucosal dissection-
dc.subject.keywordOutcomes-
dc.subject.keywordPerforation-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Jun Chul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Sung Kwan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Sang Kil-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Yong Chan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Da Hyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Hyun Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Sung Kwan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Jun Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Sang Kil-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong Chan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Da Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Hyun Soo-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage5059-
dc.citation.endPage5067-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.30(11) : 5059-5067, 2016-
dc.identifier.rimsid58831-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.