0 479

Cited 2 times in

Comparison Between a Manual Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Assay and an Automated Assay in a Clinical Setting

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김현숙-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T08:53:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-28T08:53:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0007-5027-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/163200-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare a manual squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) assay and an automated SCCA assay in a clinical setting. Methods: We included, in this study, a total of 158 specimens that had been tested using the manual SCCA assay. The CanAg SCC EIA assay and the Elecsys SCC were compared for their clinical settings. Results: Within-run and between-day coefficients of variation (CVs, %) were lower than 3%. Comparison of the manual and automated SCCA assays yielded good correlation. The correlation coefficient (R2) between the CanAg SCC EIA and Elecsys SCC assay results was 0.989 (P <.001) and the overall concordance rate was 94.3%. Conclusions: We report that the Elecsys SCC automated SCCA assay yielded performance comparable to that of the manual SCCA assay: the automated assay reduced the number of manual steps and test turnaround time.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.isPartOfLABORATORY MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleComparison Between a Manual Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Assay and an Automated Assay in a Clinical Setting-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Laboratory Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSaejin Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJuwon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Uh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyon-Suk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong-Han Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/labmed/lmy003-
dc.contributor.localIdA01117-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03460-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-7730-
dc.identifier.pmid29566170-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/labmed/article-abstract/49/3/254/4939304?redirectedFrom=fulltext-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hyon Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hyon Suk-
dc.citation.volume49-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage254-
dc.citation.endPage258-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLABORATORY MEDICINE, Vol.49(3) : 254-258, 2018-
dc.identifier.rimsid58468-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.