0 865

Cited 427 times in

Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author유경종-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T17:21:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-28T17:21:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/162524-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The use of radial-artery grafts for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may result in better postoperative outcomes than the use of saphenous-vein grafts. However, randomized, controlled trials comparing radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts have been individually underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. We performed a patient-level combined analysis of randomized, controlled trials to compare radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts for CABG. METHODS: Six trials were identified. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was graft patency on follow-up angiography. Mixed-effects Cox regression models were used to estimate the treatment effect on the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients were included in the analysis (534 patients with radial-artery grafts and 502 patients with saphenous-vein grafts). After a mean (+/-SD) follow-up time of 60+/-30 months, the incidence of adverse cardiac events was significantly lower in association with radial-artery grafts than with saphenous-vein grafts (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.01). At follow-up angiography (mean follow-up, 50+/-30 months), the use of radial-artery grafts was also associated with a significantly lower risk of occlusion (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.70; P<0.001). As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts was associated with a nominally lower incidence of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P=0.04) and a lower incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P<0.001) but not a lower incidence of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41; P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts for CABG resulted in a lower rate of adverse cardiac events and a higher rate of patency at 5 years of follow-up. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine and others.).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society-
dc.relation.isPartOfNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects/*methods-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/mortality/*surgery-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHProportional Hazards Models-
dc.subject.MESHRadial Artery/*transplantation-
dc.subject.MESHRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHReoperation/statistics & numerical data-
dc.subject.MESHSaphenous Vein/*transplantation-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Failure-
dc.subject.MESH*Vascular Patency-
dc.titleRadial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMario Gaudino-
dc.contributor.googleauthorUmberto Benedetto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStephen Fremes-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe Biondi-Zoccai-
dc.contributor.googleauthorArt Sedrakyan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJohn D Puskas-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGianni D Angelini-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBrian Buxton-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiacomo Frati-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid L Hare-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPhilip Hayward-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe Nasso-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNeil Moat-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMiodrag Peric-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung J Yoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe Speziale-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLeonard N Girardi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid P Taggart-
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa1716026-
dc.contributor.localIdA02453-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02371-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4406-
dc.identifier.pmid29708851-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYoo, Kyung Jong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYoo, Kyung Jong-
dc.citation.volume378-
dc.citation.number22-
dc.citation.startPage2069-
dc.citation.endPage2077-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.378(22) : 2069-2077, 2018-
dc.identifier.rimsid60104-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (흉부외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.