282 493

Cited 28 times in

Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김진성-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T17:07:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-28T17:07:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/162280-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: To simplify the adaptive treatment planning workflow while achieving the optimal tumor-dose coverage in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT). METHODS: In daily adaptive MR-IGRT, the plan objective function constructed during simulation is used for plan re-optimization throughout the course of treatment. In this study, we have constructed the initial objective functions using two methods for 16 pancreatic cancer patients treated with the ViewRay MR-IGRT system: 1) the conventional method that handles the stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and large bowel as separate organs at risk (OARs) and 2) the OAR grouping method. Using OAR grouping, a combined OAR structure that encompasses the portions of these four primary OARs within 3 cm of the planning target volume (PTV) is created. OAR grouping simulation plans were optimized such that the target coverage was comparable to the clinical simulation plan constructed in the conventional manner. In both cases, the initial objective function was then applied to each successive treatment fraction and the plan was re-optimized based on the patient's daily anatomy. OAR grouping plans were compared to conventional plans at each fraction in terms of coverage of the PTV and the optimized PTV (PTV OPT), which is the result of the subtraction of overlapping OAR volumes with an additional margin from the PTV. RESULTS: Plan performance was enhanced across a majority of fractions using OAR grouping. The percentage of the volume of the PTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose (D95) was improved by an average of 3.87 +/- 4.29% while D95 coverage of the PTV OPT increased by 3.98 +/- 4.97%. Finally, D100 coverage of the PTV demonstrated an average increase of 6.47 +/- 7.16% and a maximum improvement of 20.19%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, our proposed OAR grouping plans generally outperformed conventional plans, especially when the conventional simulation plan favored or disregarded an OAR through the assignment of distinct weighting parameters relative to the other critical structures. OAR grouping simplifies the MR-IGRT adaptive treatment planning workflow at simulation while demonstrating improved coverage compared to delivered pancreatic cancer treatment plans in daily adaptive radiation therapy.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIATION ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleOptimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSven Olberg-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOlga Green-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBin Cai-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDeshan Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVivian Rodriguez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHao Zhang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Sung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorParag J Parikh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSasa Mutic-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJustin C Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13014-018-1000-7-
dc.contributor.localIdA04548-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02591-
dc.identifier.eissn1748-717X-
dc.identifier.pmid29573744-
dc.subject.keywordAdaptive radiation therapy-
dc.subject.keywordMR-IGRT-
dc.subject.keywordPancreatic cancer-
dc.subject.keywordTreatment planning-
dc.subject.keywordViewRay-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jinsung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jinsung-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage51-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRADIATION ONCOLOGY, Vol.13(1) : 51, 2018-
dc.identifier.rimsid59866-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.