0 641

Cited 6 times in

Effect of ulinastatin on postoperative renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a randomized trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김나영-
dc.contributor.author김소연-
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.contributor.author이보라-
dc.contributor.author최영득-
dc.contributor.author박수정-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T08:03:33Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T08:03:33Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160794-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) is an emerging technique for treating small renal masses. Although RLPN has many advantages, ischemic kidney injury is inevitable during renal artery clamping. The overall incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after partial nephrectomy has been reported to be up to 39%. Moreover, effective pharmacological protection against AKI after partial nephrectomy has not yet been demonstrated. Ulinastatin has been shown to protect the kidney from ischemia/reperfusion injury via its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of ulinastatin on postoperative kidney function in patients undergoing RLPN. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, patients undergoing RLPN received either intravenous ulinastatin (100,000 units/10 kg; ulinastatin group, n = 35) or the same volume of normal saline (control group, n = 35) for 1 h starting 10 min before renal artery clamping. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative AKI. Secondary outcomes were levels of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), cystatin C, and inflammatory markers and were measured before operation and at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative AKI was 18% in the ulinastatin group, whereas it was 30% in the control group (p = 0.251). No significant differences in postoperative changes of serum creatinine, eGFR, or cystatin C were observed between the two groups. Postoperative inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and neutrophil percentage were significantly increased until 72 h after operation compared to the preoperative values in both groups, with no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ulinastatin (100,000 units/10 kg) during the warm ischemia and reperfusion periods did not show any beneficial effects on postoperative kidney function or inflammatory responses in patients undergoing RLPN.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleEffect of ulinastatin on postoperative renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a randomized trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBora Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSook Young Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNa Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoon Ho Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Deuk Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSujung Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSo Yeon Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-017-5608-8-
dc.contributor.localIdA00348-
dc.contributor.localIdA00616-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.contributor.localIdA01538-
dc.contributor.localIdA02803-
dc.contributor.localIdA04111-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02703-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218-
dc.identifier.pmid28593413-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-017-5608-8-
dc.subject.keywordAcute kidney injury-
dc.subject.keywordNephrectomy-
dc.subject.keywordReperfusion injury-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic surgical procedures-
dc.subject.keywordUlinastatin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, So Yeon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Soo Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Bo Ra-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, So Yeon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Soo Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Bo Ra-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage3728-
dc.citation.endPage3736-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.31(9) : 3728-3736, 2017-
dc.identifier.rimsid60679-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.