0 462

Cited 10 times in

Outcomes according to presentation with versus without cardiogenic shock in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author장양수-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T06:37:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-10T06:37:14Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9149-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/158320-
dc.description.abstractThis study is aimed at evaluating 1-year clinical outcomes and their predictors in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA)-related acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In total 248 patients diagnosed with AMI involving the ULMCA as the culprit vessel and registered in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction database were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided according to the absence (shock-, n = 206) or presence (shock+, n = 42) of cardiogenic shock at initial presentation. Independent risk factors of in-hospital cardiac death associated with ULMCA-related AMI were elucidated by multivariate regression analysis. In-hospital mortality rates were 8.7% in the shock- group and 47.6% in the shock+ group (p = 0.001). During 1-year follow-up after discharge, major adverse cardiac events developed in 16.3% of patients in the shock- group and 18.2% of patients in the shock+ group (p = 0.828); cardiac death, MI, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization were similar between the 2 groups at 1 year. On multivariate analysis, initial shock presentation (odds ratio 8.9, confidence interval 4.1 to 19.2, p = 0.004) and left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (odds ratio 7.6, confidence interval 2.7 to 21.1, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors of in-hospital cardiac death associated with ULMCA-related AMI. In conclusion, almost 1/2 of patients with ULMCA-related AMI presenting with cardiogenic shock had a fatal in-hospital outcome compared to <10% of those without cardiogenic shock; however, clinical outcomes after survival of the in-hospital period were not different between these groups.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAngioplasty, Balloon, Coronary-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/complications*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHElectrocardiography-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHospital Mortality/trends-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIncidence-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/complications*-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHOdds Ratio-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRegistries*-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHShock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology*-
dc.subject.MESHShock, Cardiogenic/etiology-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleOutcomes according to presentation with versus without cardiogenic shock in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorUng Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong-Seon Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Wook Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYou-Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon-Jong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Hee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGeu-Ru Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong-Gu Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Jo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyung Ho Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShung Chull Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Ho Hur-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn-Whan Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaek Jong Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Ho Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong Chan Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYangsoo Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJunghan Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Bae Seung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Jung Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.044-
dc.contributor.localIdA03448-
dc.contributor.localIdA04386-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00071-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1913-
dc.identifier.pmid22481010-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914912008478-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.citation.volume110-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage36-
dc.citation.endPage39-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, Vol.110(1) : 36-39, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid40692-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.