Cited 9 times in
Outcomes of the single-stent versus kissing-stents technique in asymmetric complex aortoiliac bifurcation lesions
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 고영국 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김병극 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김중선 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 신동호 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 장양수 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 최동훈 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 홍명기 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-26T16:55:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-26T16:55:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0741-5214 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/156962 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the outcomes of single-stent vs kissing-stents techniques in asymmetric complex aortoiliac bifurcation (ACAB) lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 80 consecutive patients (69 males, 66.6 ± 8.7 years) treated with a single stent and 30 patients (26 males, 67.1 ± 7.7 years) treated with kissing stents for ACAB between January 2005 and December 2012 from a single-center cohort. A ACAB lesion was defined as a symptomatic unilateral common iliac artery stenosis (>50%) combined with intermediate stenosis (30%-50%) in the contralateral common iliac artery ostium. The primary end point was the primary patency of the ACAB. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between the single-stent and the kissing-stents group. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The single-stent group required fewer stents (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.3 ± 0.8; P < .001) and less bilateral femoral access (55% vs 100%; P < .001). Two patients in the single-stent group (3%) required bailout kissing stents because of plaque shift to the contralateral side. The major complication rates were 8% in single-stent vs 13% in the kissing-stent group, which was similar (P = .399). At 3 years, the single-stent and kissing-stents group had similar rates of primary patency (89% vs 87%; P = .916) and target lesion revascularization-free survival (93% vs 87%; P = .462). CONCLUSIONS: The single-stent technique in ACAB was safe and showed midterm outcomes comparable with those of kissing stents. Considering the benefits, such as fewer stents, less bilateral femoral access, and the availability of contralateral access for future intervention, the single-stent technique may be an advantageous treatment option in ACAB. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adult | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged, 80 and over | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aortic Diseases/diagnosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aortic Diseases/physiopathology | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aortic Diseases/therapy* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aortography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Constriction, Pathologic | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Disease-Free Survival | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Endovascular Procedures/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Iliac Artery*/diagnostic imaging | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Iliac Artery*/physiopathology | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Republic of Korea | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Stents* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Time Factors | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Vascular Patency | - |
dc.title | Outcomes of the single-stent versus kissing-stents technique in asymmetric complex aortoiliac bifurcation lesions | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Internal Medicine | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yongsung Suh | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Young-Guk Ko | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Dong-Ho Shin | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jung-Sun Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Byeong-Keuk Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Donghoon Choi | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Myeong-Ki Hong | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yangsoo Jang | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.031 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A00127 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A00493 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A00961 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A02097 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03448 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04053 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04391 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J01924 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1097-6809 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25953019 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Ko, Young Guk | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Byeong Keuk | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Jung Sun | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Shin, Dong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Jang, Yang Soo | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Choi, Dong Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Hong, Myeong Ki | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Ko, Young Guk | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Byeong Keuk | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jung Sun | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Shin, Dong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Jang, Yang Soo | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choi, Dong Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Hong, Myeong Ki | - |
dc.citation.volume | 62 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 68 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 74 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, Vol.62(1) : 68-74, 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 41271 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.