0 633

Cited 20 times in

Relationship Between the Size of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Positron Emission Tomographic/Computer Tomographic Findings in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김대준-
dc.contributor.author박성용-
dc.contributor.author박철근-
dc.contributor.author윤미진-
dc.contributor.author이정원-
dc.contributor.author정희석-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-26T16:43:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-26T16:43:11Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/156751-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We measured the sizes of metastatic lymph nodes and the relationships thereof by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT). We identified risk factors for nodal upstaging in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Eighty-five patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy were assessed. Two radiologists blinded to pathology data reviewed PET/CT scans, evaluating both primary tumors and lymph node involvement. A pathologist examined all metastatic lymph nodes in terms of maximal diameter (LNmax), the size of the metastatic focus (Fmax), and the metastasis occupation ratio (MOR = Fmax/LNmax). RESULTS: The maximal tumor length averaged 2.9 ± 0.2 cm and the mean SUVmax of the primary lesion 5.3 ± 0.5. On PET/CT scans, 26 (30.6 %) patients exhibited nodal metastasis and 59 (69.4 %) did not. Pathology grades of pN0, pN1, pN2, and pN3 were assigned to 45 (52.9 %), 24 (28.2 %), 13 (15.3 %), and 3 (3.5 %) patients, respectively. Nodal upstaging was evident in 29 (34.1 %) cases. In 123 metastatic nodes of 4212 nodes dissected, the LNmax was 6.60 ± 0.39 mm, the Fmax 4.47 ± 0.35 mm, and the MOR 0.68 ± 0.03. Of 123 nodes, 85 (69.1 %) were retrieved from PET-negative stations, and the LNmax and Fmax values of these nodes were 5.88 ± 0.42 and 3.75 ± 0.31 mm, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, tumor length (OR 1.666, p = 0.019) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 41.038, p < 0.001) were risk factors for nodal upstaging. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of nodal metastases were too small to detect via PET/CT imaging. Therefore, meticulous lymph node dissection might be helpful in ESCC patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfWORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Vessels/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHEsophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHEsophageal Neoplasms/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHEsophagectomy-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorodeoxyglucose F18-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Node Excision*-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Nodes/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLymphatic Metastasis-
dc.subject.MESHLymphatic Vessels/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMediastinum-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMultimodal Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Grading-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Invasiveness-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPositron-Emission Tomography*-
dc.subject.MESHRadiopharmaceuticals-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed*-
dc.subject.MESHTumor Burden-
dc.titleRelationship Between the Size of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Positron Emission Tomographic/Computer Tomographic Findings in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Yong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Joon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Suk Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi Jin Yun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Won Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheol Keun Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-015-3221-3-
dc.contributor.localIdA00368-
dc.contributor.localIdA01508-
dc.contributor.localIdA05244-
dc.contributor.localIdA02550-
dc.contributor.localIdA03117-
dc.contributor.localIdA03793-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02802-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2323-
dc.identifier.pmid26324159-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00268-015-3221-3-
dc.subject.keywordEsophageal Cancer-
dc.subject.keywordEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordMetastatic Lymph Node-
dc.subject.keywordMetabolic Tumor Volume-
dc.subject.keywordEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patient-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dae Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Seong Yong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Cheol Keun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYun, Mi Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Jeong Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Hee Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dae Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Seong Yong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Cheol Keun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYun, Mi Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jeong Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Hee Suk-
dc.citation.volume39-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage2948-
dc.citation.endPage2954-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationWORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Vol.39(12) : 2948-2954, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid39880-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (흉부외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.