0 525

Cited 8 times in

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-dose S-Amlodipine/Telmisartan and Telmisartan in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled with Telmisartan: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author임세중-
dc.contributor.author하종원-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T08:11:32Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-26T08:11:32Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0149-2918-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/153098-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination S-amlodipine plus telmisartan (S-AM/TEL) compared with TEL monotherapy in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by TEL monotherapy. METHODS: this study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, Phase III, 8-week clinical trial to compare the superiority of the S-AM/TEL 2.5/40-mg and S-AM/TEL 5/40-mg combinations with TEL 80-mg mono-therapy. The primary end point was the change in the mean sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline (week 0) after 8 weeks of therapy between treatment groups. FINDINGS: Of 325 patients screened, 183 were randomly assigned to 3 groups (61 in the S-AM/TEL 2.5/40-mg group, 60 in the S-AM/TEL 5/40-mg group, and 62 in the TEL 80-mg group). Mean (SD) age was 53.9 (7.5) years, and male patients comprised 87%. No significant differences were found among the 3 groups in baseline characteristics. The primary end points, the changes of mean (SD) diastolic blood pressure at week 8 from the baseline were -10.56 (7.23) mm Hg in the S-AM/TEL 2.5/40-mg group, -12.32 (9.23) mm Hg in the S-AM/TEL 5/40-mg group, and -2.44 (7.92) mm Hg in the TEL 80-mg group. Both the S-AM/TEL 2.5/40-mg group and the S-AM/TEL 5/40-mg group had a statistically superior hypotensive effect compared with the TEL 80-mg group (P < 0.0001 for both). For evaluation of the safety profile, the frequencies of adverse events (AEs) among the groups were also not significantly different (S-AM/TEL 2.5/40-mg group, 18.6%; S-AM/TEL 5/40-mg group, 20%; and TEL 80-mg group, 22.6%), and the incidences of AEs were not different among the groups. The most common AEs were respiratory disorders, followed by headache, dizziness, and peripheral edema. IMPLICATIONS: Treatment with S-AM/TEL 2.5/40 mg and S-AM/TEL 5/40 mg was superior to increasing the TEL dose in terms of hypotensive effect in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by TEL monotherapy. S-AM/TEL fixed-dose combinations are an effective and tolerable option for patients inadequately responding to TEL monotherapy and also a good option for improving patients' medication adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT011426100.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL THERAPEUTICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleComparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-dose S-Amlodipine/Telmisartan and Telmisartan in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled with Telmisartan: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.locationUnited States-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Gyu Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae Hun Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ju Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyung Seob Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Yeong Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Geun Ryu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheol Ho Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Soo Hyeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Je Tak-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSe Jung Im-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Won Ha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWook Beom Pyeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJe Geon Jae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyu Rok Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Hyung Doh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Wook Im-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong Muk Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.006-
dc.contributor.localIdA04257-
dc.contributor.localIdA03372-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00614-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-114X-
dc.identifier.pmid27720505-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291816307287?via%3Dihub-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRim, Se Joong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHa, Jong Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHa, Jong Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRim, Se Joong-
dc.citation.volume38-
dc.citation.number10-
dc.citation.startPage2185-
dc.citation.endPage2194-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, Vol.38(10) : 2185-2194, 2016-
dc.date.modified2017-10-24-
dc.identifier.rimsid41100-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.