0 503

Cited 33 times in

Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김형일-
dc.contributor.author손태일-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.contributor.author노성훈-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T07:37:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-26T07:37:23Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1436-3291-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/152289-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Robotic surgery for gastric cancer has been adopted to overcome technical difficulties in performing laparoscopic gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy from 2003 to 2010 in a single high-volume center were included in this study. We retrospectively compared preoperative characteristics, perioperative factors, and oncological parameters among an elderly (≥70 years old) robotic gastrectomy group (n = 49), a younger (<70 years old) robotic gastrectomy group (n = 321), and an elderly laparoscopic gastrectomy group (n = 132). RESULTS: The elderly robotic group presented with more comorbidities than the younger robotic group. Except for number of retrieved lymph nodes (36.5 vs. 41.5; P = 0.007), short-term operative outcomes including complications and pathological parameters were comparable between the two robotic groups. The elderly robotic group showed comparable disease-specific survival to the younger robotic group although overall survival was worse. Compared to their laparoscopic counterparts, the elderly robotic group showed longer mean operation time (227 vs. 174 min). Nevertheless, the incidence and severity of postoperative complications was not different between the two elderly groups. Overall and disease-specific survival were also comparable between the elderly groups. In multivariate analysis, age and surgical approach were not risk factors for overall and major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of robotic gastrectomy in the elderly did not differ from those in younger robotic gastrectomy patients and were comparable to those in elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. Thus, robotic gastrectomy could be a safe and feasible approach in elderly patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Tokyo-
dc.relation.isPartOfGASTRIC CANCER-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHComorbidity-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHGastrectomy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Node Excision-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications*-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate-
dc.titleRobotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.locationJapan-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNaoki Okumura-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaeil Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyoung-Il Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Yeong An-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hoon Noh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jin Hyung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10120-015-0560-6-
dc.contributor.localIdA01998-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.contributor.localIdA01281-
dc.contributor.localIdA01154-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00916-
dc.identifier.eissn1436-3305-
dc.identifier.pmid26541766-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10120-015-0560-6-
dc.subject.keywordElderly-
dc.subject.keywordGastrectomy-
dc.subject.keywordLaparoscopy-
dc.subject.keywordMinimally invasive surgery-
dc.subject.keywordRobot-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hyoung Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hyoung Il-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage1125-
dc.citation.endPage1134-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGASTRIC CANCER, Vol.19(4) : 1125-1134, 2016-
dc.date.modified2017-10-24-
dc.identifier.rimsid48024-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.