257 393

Cited 0 times in

골유착성 임플랜트 지지 고정성 보철물과 자연치의 최대교합력 비교

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author한동후-
dc.contributor.author황선홍-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T06:31:07Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-26T06:31:07Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.issn0301-2875-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/150916-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum occlusal force implant prostheses to natural teeth. Materials & Methods: Fifty nine patients treated either with Bra.nemark implants and ITI implants during the recent ten years were involved in this study. The maximum occlusal force were measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system. Results: 1. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses and natural teeth were not significantly different where measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system. 2. The maximum occlusal forces were not significantly different between Bra.nemark implant and ITI implant prostheses. 3. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses had lower when compared with natural teeth during 1-6 months functional periods when measured with the unilareral bite force recorder(p<0.05) and 1-12 months functional periods when measured with the dental prescale system(p<0.05). After these periods there was not statistical significant difference between the implant prostheses and natural teeth. 4. The maximum occlusal forces of the wide diameter implant prostheses were higher than the maximum occlusal forces of the regular diameter implant prostheses when measured with dental prescale system(p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the wide diameter and the regular diameter implant prostheses when measured with unilateral bite force recorder. 5. The maximum occlusal forces of the single implant prostheses were not significantly different with the splinting implants prostheses. 6. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses were not significantly different by age and sex. 7. There was significantly different between maximum occlusal forces measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system(p<0.0001), but there was positive correlation(r=0.52, p<0.05). Conclusion: The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses were not significantly different to natural teeth during clenching and unilateral maximum biting.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageKorean, English-
dc.publisherKorean Academy of Prosthodontics)-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHImplant-
dc.subject.MESHMaximum occlusal force-
dc.title골유착성 임플랜트 지지 고정성 보철물과 자연치의 최대교합력 비교-
dc.title.alternativeComparison of maximum occlusal forces on osseointegrated implant supported fixed prostheses and natural teeth-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.locationKorea-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthor권영숙-
dc.contributor.googleauthor황선홍-
dc.contributor.googleauthor한동후-
dc.identifier.doiOAK-2005-03880-
dc.contributor.localIdA04277-
dc.contributor.localIdA04464-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01493-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-3789-
dc.subject.keywordImplant-
dc.subject.keywordMaximum occlusal force-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHan, Dong Hoo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHwang, Sun Hong-
dc.citation.volume43-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage498-
dc.citation.endPage510-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지), Vol.43(4) : 498-510, 2005-
dc.date.modified2017-05-04-
dc.identifier.rimsid42767-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.