Cited 37 times in
Prospective Study for Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 25- and 22-Gauge Core Biopsy Needles in Solid Pancreatic Masses
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김호근 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박승우 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박정엽 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 방승민 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 송시영 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이희승 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정문재 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정재복 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이상훈 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-27T07:25:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-27T07:25:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/146879 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although thicker needles theoretically allow more tissue to be collected, their decreased flexibility can cause mechanical damage to the endoscope, technical failure, and sample blood contamination. The effects of needle gauge on diagnostic outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) of pancreatic mass lesions remain unknown. This study compared procurement rates of histologic cores obtained from EUS-FNB of pancreatic masses using 25- and 22-gauge core biopsy needles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2014 to July 2014, 66 patients with solid pancreatic mass underwent EUS-FNB with both 25- and 22-gauge core biopsy needles. Among them, 10 patients were excluded and thus 56 patients were eligible for the analyses. Needle sequences were randomly assigned, and two passes were made with each needle, consisting of 10 uniform to-and-fro movements on each pass with 10 mL syringe suction. A pathologist blinded to needle sequence evaluated specimens for the presence of histologic core. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.8 ± 9.5 years (range, 44-89 years); 35 patients (62.5%) were men. The mean pancreatic mass size was 35.3 ± 17.1 mm (range 14-122.3 mm). Twenty-eight patients (50%) had tumors at the pancreas head or uncinate process. There were no significant differences in procurement rates of histologic cores between 25-gauge (49/56, 87.5%) and 22-gauge (46/56, 82.1%, P = 0.581) needles or diagnostic accuracy using only histologic cores (98% and 95%). There were no technical failures or procedure-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 25-gauge core biopsy needle could offer acceptable and comparable outcomes regarding diagnostic performance including histologic core procurement rates compared to the 22-gauge core biopsy needle, although the differences were not statistically significant. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | PLOS ONE | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adult | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged, 80 and over | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/instrumentation* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Needles* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pancreas/pathology* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prospective Studies | - |
dc.title | Prospective Study for Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 25- and 22-Gauge Core Biopsy Needles in Solid Pancreatic Masses | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | United States | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Pathology | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Se Woo Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Moon Jae Chung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Sang Hoon Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hee Seung Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyun Jik Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jeong Yup Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seung Woo Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Si Young Song | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hoguen Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jae Bock Chung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seungmin Bang | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0154401 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01183 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01551 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01647 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01786 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A02035 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A02836 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03349 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03602 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03706 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J02540 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27149404 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Ho Keun | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Seung Woo | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Jeong Youp | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Bang, Seung Min | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Song, Si Young | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Sang Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Hee Seung | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Chung, Moon Jae | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Chung, Jae Bock | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Ho Keun | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Seung Woo | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Jeong Youp | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Bang, Seung Min | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Song, Si Young | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Sang Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Hee Seung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Chung, Moon Jae | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Chung, Jae Bock | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | e0154401 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PLOS ONE, Vol.11(5) : e0154401, 2016 | - |
dc.date.modified | 2017-02-24 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 46446 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.