513 716

Cited 0 times in

VOCs의 위해성평가를 위한 노출분석 방법연구

Other Titles
 The Development of Exposure Assessment Tools for Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds 
Authors
 조성준  ;  신동천  ;  정용  ;  이덕희  ;  이덕회  ;  Patrick N. Breysse 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Environmental Toxicology, Vol.17(2) : 147-160, 2002 
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Environmental Toxicology(환경독성학회지)
ISSN
 1226-9158 
Issue Date
2002
Keywords
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ; Exposure Assessment ; Risk Assessment ; Environmental measurement ; Biological monitoring ; Personal dosimetry ; Active Sampler ; Passive Sampler ; Thermal desorption
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are an important public health issue in Korea and many important questions remain to be addressed with respect to assessing exposure to these compounds. Because they are ubiquitous and highly volatile, special techniques must be applied in their analytic determination Valid Personal exposure assessment methods are needed to evaluate exposure frequency, duration and intensity, as well as their relationship to personal exposure characteristics. Biological monitoring is also important since it may contribute significantly in risk assessment by allowing the estimation of effective absorbed doses. This study was on ducted to establish the environmental measurement, personal dosimetry and biological monitoring methods for VOCs. These methods are needed to compare blood, urinary and exhalation breath VOC levels and to provide tools for risk assessment of VOC exposure. Passive monitors (badge type) and a active samplers (trap) for the VOCs collection were used for air sampling. Methods development included determining the minimum detectable amounts of VOCs in each media, as well as evaluating collection methods and developing analytical procedures. Method reliability was assessed by determining breakthrough volumes and comparing results between laboratories and with other methods. A total capacity of trap used in this study was 60ι. Although variable by compound, the average breakthrough was 20%. Also, there was no loss of compounds in trap even if keep for 45 day in -70℃. The recovery of active and passive methods was 69% ~ 126% and method detection limit was 0.24 ㎍/trap and 0.07 ㎍/badge. There was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between active and passive methods.
Files in This Item:
T200207113.pdf Download
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Preventive Medicine (예방의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Dong Chun(신동천) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-2280
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/144098
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links