0 397

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different formulations of omeprazole-based triple therapies in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이동기-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T10:53:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T10:53:52Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.issn0944-1174-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/143356-
dc.description.abstractLittle is known about the efficacy and safety of different formulations of omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcer. We compared the efficacy and safety of two formulations of omeprazole used in triple therapies in patients with H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer. Seventy-four patients with endoscopically proven H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer were randomized to two groups, each with 37 patients, to receive either OAC-I (6 weeks of "A" formulation of omeprazole [20 mg twice daily] plus 2 weeks of amoxicillin [1.0 g twice daily] and clarithromycin [500 mg twice daily] or OAC-II (6 weeks of "B" formulation of omeprazole [20 mg twice daily] plus 2 weeks of the same antibiotics. The H. pylori and ulcer healing status were assessed at the baseline and at the 6-week endpoint of therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms, documentation of adverse events, and standard laboratory examinations were assessed at each visit. Eradication of H. pylori (intention to treat [n = 74]/per protocol [n = 66]) and healing of the ulcer were successful in 83.8%/96.9% and 93.8%, respectively, of the OAC-I group patients, and in 91.9%/100% and 97.1%, respectively, of the OAC-II group patients (P = 0.477; P = 0.608). The OAC-I group experienced rapid resolution of symptoms, but no significant differences were found between the two groups for number of days taken for resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse events, and laboratory findings. The two different formulations of omeprazole used in triple therapy regimens produced similar efficacy and safety results after 6 weeks of treatment in patients with H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer..-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent96~102-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAmoxicillin/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAnti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCapsules-
dc.subject.MESHClarithromycin/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Therapy, Combination-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHelicobacter Infections/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHHelicobacter pylori*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHOmeprazole/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHOmeprazole/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHPeptic Ulcer/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHPeptic Ulcer/microbiology*-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTablets-
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy and safety of different formulations of omeprazole-based triple therapies in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Ki Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwang Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYon Soo Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Woo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong In Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Ku Baik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Ok Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMee Yon Cho-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02723-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01416-
dc.identifier.eissn1435-5922-
dc.identifier.pmid11227677-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=ca0701e0-af9e-408b-93bf-551b49a47b6c%40sessionmgr4005&crlhashurl=login.aspx%253fdirect%253dtrue%2526scope%253dsite%2526db%253dmdc%2526AN%253d11227677%2526msid%253d604024421&hid=4101&vid=0&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=11227677&db=mdc-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Dong Ki-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Dong Ki-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage96-
dc.citation.endPage102-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol.36(2) : 96-102, 2001-
dc.identifier.rimsid53100-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.