0 726

Cited 4 times in

Transurethral resection of the prostate for patients with Gleason score 6 prostate cancer and symptomatic prostatic enlargement: a risk-adaptive strategy for the era of active surveillance

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author구교철-
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.contributor.author박상언-
dc.contributor.author양승철-
dc.contributor.author정병하-
dc.contributor.author홍성준-
dc.contributor.author홍창희-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T11:48:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T11:48:07Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/141234-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate whether transurethral resection of the prostate can be used as both (i) treatment for symptomatic prostatic enlargement in patients with prostate cancer and (ii) a risk-adaptive strategy for reducing prostate-specific antigen levels and broadening the indications of active surveillance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 3680 patients who underwent prostate biopsies at a single institution (March 2006 to January 2012). Of 529 men who had Gleason score 6 prostate cancer and were ineligible for active surveillance, 86 (16.3%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic enlargement. We assessed how changes in prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density influenced the eligibility for active surveillance and the outcome of subsequent therapy. The following active surveillance criteria were used: prostate-specific antigen ≤ 10 ng/ml, prostate-specific antigen density ≤ 0.15, positive cores ≤ 3 and single core involvement ≤ 50%. RESULTS: The median age, pre-operative prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume were 71 years, 6.95 ng/ml, and 45.8 g, respectively. In 82.6% (71/86) of analyzed cases, ineligibility for active surveillance had resulted from elevated prostate-specific antigen level or prostate-specific antigen density. With a median resection of 16.5 g, transurethral resection of the prostate reduced the percentage of prostate-specific antigen and the percentage of prostate-specific antigen density by 34.5 and 50.0%, respectively, making 81.7% (58/71) of the patients eligible for active surveillance. Prostate-specific antigen level remained stabilized in all (21/21) patients maintained on active surveillance without disease progression during the median follow-up of 50.6 months. Among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, 96.7% (29/30) exhibited localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adaptive transurethral resection of the prostate may prevent overtreatment and allay prostate-specific antigen-associated anxiety in patients with biopsy-proven low-grade prostate cancer and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Additional benefits include voiding symptom improvement and the avoidance of curative therapy's immediate side effects.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent785~790-
dc.relation.isPartOfJAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers, Tumor/blood*-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Grading-
dc.subject.MESHPopulation Surveillance*/methods-
dc.subject.MESHProstate-Specific Antigen/blood*-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/blood-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/complications-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Assessment-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTransurethral Resection of Prostate*-
dc.titleTransurethral resection of the prostate for patients with Gleason score 6 prostate cancer and symptomatic prostatic enlargement: a risk-adaptive strategy for the era of active surveillance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨기과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyo Chul Koo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Un Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoon Ho Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Joon Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Choul Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Hee Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Ha Chung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyv073-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00188-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.contributor.localIdA01486-
dc.contributor.localIdA02294-
dc.contributor.localIdA03607-
dc.contributor.localIdA04402-
dc.contributor.localIdA04447-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01207-
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3621-
dc.identifier.pmid25979243-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://jjco.oxfordjournals.org/content/45/8/785.long-
dc.subject.keywordprostate cancer-
dc.subject.keywordprostate-specific antigen-
dc.subject.keywordsurveillance-
dc.subject.keywordtransurethral resection of prostate-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoo, Kyo Chul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Sang Un-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYang, Seung Choul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Byung Ha-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Sung Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Chang Hee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKoo, Kyo Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Sang Un-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYang, Seung Choul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Byung Ha-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Sung Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Chang Hee-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume45-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage785-
dc.citation.endPage790-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.45(8) : 785-790, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid31427-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.