186 452

Cited 7 times in

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정지예-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T11:12:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T11:12:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139921-
dc.description.abstractTwo once-daily inhaled bronchodilators, indacaterol and tiotropium, are widely used as first-line therapy in stable COPD patients. This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12. Four RCTs were eligible for inclusion (three RCTs with moderate-to-severe COPD patients and one RCT with only severe COPD patients). Trough FEV₁ at weeks 12 and 26 were not significantly different between indacaterol and tiotropium by the standardized mean difference with 0.014 (95% CI, -0.036, 0.063, I²= 23.5%) and with 0.037 (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.133, I²= 0%) along with differences in means of 0.003L and 0.014L, respectively. Indacaterol and tiotropium also showed similar St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores and percentages of patients with SGRQ improvement (≥ 4 units) at week 26. The incidences of nasopharyngitis, serious cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events were not different between indacaterol and tiotropium, while those of cough (OR = 1.68, P < 0.001, and RR = 1.63) and COPD worsening (OR = 1.18, P = 0.003, and RR = 1.12) were higher for indacaterol than tiotropium. However, when one study with only severe COPD patients was removed from the meta-analysis, the difference in the incidence of COPD worsening between indacaterol and tiotropium became non-significant (OR = 1.13, P = 0.204, and RR = 1.09). The clinical efficacy and serious adverse events between indacaterol and tiotropium were equivocal in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Cough is a common complaint associated with indacaterol, and COPD worsening needs to be carefully monitored in severe COPD patients when treated with indacaterol.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extente0119948-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLOS ONE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHBronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHForced Expiratory Volume/drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIndans/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHQuinolones/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHTiotropium Bromide/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleComparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinkyeong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Yong Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeon-Mok Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwang Ha Yoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Bum Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Soo Sheen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin-Ji Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorK. C. Carriere-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Ye Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Yun Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0119948-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03735-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02540-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.pmid25799171-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Ji Ye-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Ji Ye-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPagee0119948-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPLOS ONE, Vol.10(3) : e0119948, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid48380-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.