1 239

Cited 108 times in

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김대근-
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T11:10:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T11:10:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139847-
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is rapidly increasing; however, the benefit of RPN over laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes of RPN and LPN. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, the Cochrane Library, KoreaMed, KMbase, KISS, RISS, and KisTi from their inception through August 2013. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized form. Quality of the selected studies was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 23 studies and 2240 patients were included. All studies were cohort studies with no randomization, and the methodological quality varied. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grades 1-2 (p=0.62), Clavien-Dindo classification grades 3-5 (p=0.78), change of serum creatinine (p=0.65), operative time (p=0.35), estimated blood loss (p=0.76), and positive margins (p=0.75). The RPN group had a significantly lower rate of conversion to open surgery (p=0.02) and conversion to radical surgery (p=0.0006), shorter warm ischemia time (WIT; p=0.005), smaller change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; p=0.03), and shorter length of stay (LOS; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that RPN is associated with more favorable results than LPN in conversion rate to open or radical surgery, WIT, change of eGFR, and shorter LOS. To establish the safety and effectiveness outcomes of robotic surgery, well-designed randomized clinical studies with long-term follow-up are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: Robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) is more favorable than laparoscopic PN in terms of lower conversion rate to radical nephrectomy, a favorable renal function indexed estimated glomerular filtration rate, shorter length of hospital stay, and shorter warm ischemia time.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent891~901-
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean Urology-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleComparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨기과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Eun Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hye You-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Keun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoon Ho Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeon Heui Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.028-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00365-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00854-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283814012949-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dae Keun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dae Keun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume67-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage891-
dc.citation.endPage901-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEuropean Urology, Vol.67(5) : 891-901, 2015-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.