539 611

Cited 0 times in

Single-row versus double-row capsulolabral repair : a comparative evaluation of contact pressure and surface area in the capsulolabral complex-glenoid bone interface

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김두섭-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-21T07:49:41Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-21T07:49:41Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/125219-
dc.descriptionDept. of Medicine/박사-
dc.description.abstract[한글] [영문]Background: Despite attentions had been paid to restoration of the capsulolabral complex anatomical insertion onto the glenoid, studies that compared the pressurized contact area and mean interface pressure at the anatomical insertion site between a single-row repair and a double-row labral repair have been uncommon.Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare the mean interface pressure and pressurized contact area at the anatomical insertion site of the capsulolabral complex between a single-row repair and a double-row repair technique.Methods: Thirty fresh frozen cadaver shoulders (mean age. 61±8 years; range, 48-71 years) were used for this study. Two types of repair were performed on each specimen : (1) a single-row repair and (2) a double-row repair. Using pressure sensitive films (Prescale Ultra Super Low Pressure Fuji Photo Film, C. Itoh & Co, New York, NY), the interface contact area and contact pressure were examined.Results: The mean interface pressure was greater for the double- row repair technique (0.29±0.04 MPa) when compared with the single row repair technique (0.21±0.03 MPa) (p=0.003). The mean pressurized contact area was also significantly greater for the double- row repair technique (211.8±18.6 mm², 78.4% footprint) compared with the single row repair technique (106.4±16.8 mm² , 39.4% footprint) (p=0.001).Conclusion: The results of this study show that the double-row repair has significantly greater mean interface pressure and pressurized contact area at the insertion site of capsulolabral complex than single-row repair. Therefore, it is considered that the double row repair is more advantageous than the single row repair to restore the native footprint area of the capsulolabral complex.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.publisherGraduate School, Yonsei University-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleSingle-row versus double-row capsulolabral repair : a comparative evaluation of contact pressure and surface area in the capsulolabral complex-glenoid bone interface-
dc.title.alternative단일열 봉합술 대 이중열 봉합술 : 관절낭 관절와순 복합체-관절와 간격에서의 접촉압과 접촉 면적의 비교 분석-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Doo Sup-
dc.type.localDissertation-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Others (기타) > 3. Dissertation

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.