0 627

Cited 32 times in

Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Assessment of Morcellation versus Intact Specimen Extraction on Postoperative Status

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-15T16:46:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-15T16:46:09Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.issn0022-5347-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/113562-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: We compared pathological evaluation and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy at our institution with morcellated vs intact specimen extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective evaluation of 57 consecutive patients undergoing radical and simple transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy was reviewed. One patient was excluded from study due to transitional cell carcinoma, which was detected intraoperatively. The 33 morcellated specimens were extracted at the umbilical port and the 23 intact specimens were extracted through a midline infraumbilical incision. Data were obtained on narcotic requirements, hospital stay, complications, estimated blood loss, mass size based on preoperative imaging, specimen weight and extraction incision length. RESULTS: Mean incision length in the morcellated and intact specimen removal groups was 1.2 and 7.1 cm, respectively (p <0.001). No significant differences in pain or recovery were noted between the 2 groups. Two cases of microscopic invasion of the perinephric adipose tissue in the intact specimen group were up staged from clinical T1 to pT3a disease. No change in patient treatment was made based on this information. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant difference in surgical time, pain or hospital stay. Only incision length was statistically significant. Postoperative recovery appeared to be similar in these 2 groups. With modern imaging modalities information on pathological stage did not alter patient treatment.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent412~415-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF UROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNephrectomy/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHNephrectomy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.titleLaparoscopic Nephrectomy: Assessment of Morcellation versus Intact Specimen Extraction on Postoperative Status-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨기과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFERNANDO HERNANDEZ-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKOON H. RHA-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTHOMAS W. JARRETT-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLOUIS R. KAVOUSSI-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTHERESA Y. CHAN-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNICHOLAS KLICOS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFERNANDO J. KIM-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPETER A. PINTO-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.ju.0000076667.70020.82-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01921-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-3792-
dc.identifier.pmid12853788-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534705633393-
dc.subject.keywordkidney-
dc.subject.keywordlaparoscopy-
dc.subject.keywordnephrectomy-
dc.subject.keywordspecimen handling-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume170-
dc.citation.number2Pt.1-
dc.citation.startPage412-
dc.citation.endPage415-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Vol.170(2Pt.1) : 412-415, 2003-
dc.identifier.rimsid52213-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.