0 680

Cited 0 times in

Patterns and relevant factors of tumor recurrence for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma after radical resection

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김경식-
dc.contributor.author박승우-
dc.contributor.author송시영-
dc.contributor.author이우정-
dc.contributor.author정재복-
dc.contributor.author최진섭-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T16:44:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-14T16:44:28Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.issn0172-6390-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/111495-
dc.description.abstractThe complete surgical removal of bile duct cancer offers the only chance of cure. Long-term survival, however, is very limited because of frequent recurrence after surgery. As it is important to know the mode of recurrence and its relevant factors for early detection, prevention, and selecting an ideal strategy for adjuvant therapy, we determined the frequent mode of recurrence after curative surgery and analyzed its risk factors. Eighty-three patients who underwent radical resection for bile duct cancer were evaluated. The tumors comprised 24 proximal and 59 middle or distal bile duct carcinomas. The clinicopathologic findings and the modes of recurrence were reviewed. Tumor recurrence developed in 18 of 24 proximal and 34 of 59 non-proximal cancers at an average interval of 16.7 and 17.8 postoperative months, respectively. T-stage (p=0.031) and age (p=0.019) were independent factors affecting recurrence on multivariate analysis. The factors, however, were different according to tumor location that while histological grade was the only factor for proximal tumor, nodal status and age were independent factors for non-proximal tumors. The precise recurrent sites were identifiable in 14 proximal and 24 non-proximal lesions. While the predominant pattern of recurrence was locoregional in most proximal tumors (13/14), non-proximal tumors showed frequent recurrences at distant sites including liver, peritoneum, and lung (13/24). The median survival was longer in non-proximal (45.3 months) than proximal tumor (18.0 months), in T0,1-tumor (>120 months) than T2,3-tumor (20.4 months), and in N0-tumor (60.2 months) than N1,2-tumor (13.0 months). The 5-year survival rates were also higher in non-proximal cancers (46.7% vs. 32.0%). Our results suggested that the need for postoperative adjuvant therapy, and strategies to detect and to prevent recurrence should be individualized not only by stage but also by tumor location to improve survival in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfHEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAge Distribution-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAnalysis of Variance-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Neoplasms/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHBile Ducts, Extrahepatic*-
dc.subject.MESHCohort Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIncidence-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Invasiveness/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHProbability-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHProportional Hazards Models-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Assessment-
dc.subject.MESHSex Distribution-
dc.subject.MESHStatistics, Nonparametric-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Analysis-
dc.titlePatterns and relevant factors of tumor recurrence for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma after radical resection-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Woo Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Soo Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi Young Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByong Ro Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo-Jung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Sup Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Sik Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Kyung Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Bock Chung-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00984-
dc.identifier.pmid15532789-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Kyung Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Seung Woo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSong, Si Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Woo Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Jae Bock-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Jin Sub-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume51-
dc.citation.number60-
dc.citation.startPage1612-
dc.citation.endPage1618-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol.51(60) : 1612-1618, 2004-
dc.identifier.rimsid34876-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.