3067 746

Cited 0 times in

치과임상영역에서 발생된 의료분쟁의 판례분석

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author안형준-
dc.contributor.author최종훈-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-10T12:59:17Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-10T12:59:17Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn1225-0627-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/110806-
dc.description.abstractAlong with the development of scientific technologies, health care has been growing remarkably, and as the social life quality improves with increasing interest in health, the demand for medical service is rapidly increasing. However, medical accident and medical dispute also are rapidly increasing due to various factors such as, increasing sense of people's right, lack of understanding in the nature of medical practice, over expectation on medical technique, commercialize medical supply system, moral degeneracy and unawareness of medical jurisprudence by doctors, widespread trend of mutual distrust, and lack of systematized device for solution of medical dispute. This study analysed 30 cases of civil suit in the year between 1994 to 2004, which were selected among the medical dispute cases in dental field with the judgement collected from organizations related to dentistry and department of oral medicine, Yonsei university dental hospital. The following results were drawn from the analyses: 1. The distribution of year showed rapid increase of medical dispute after the year 2000. 2. In the types of medical dispute, suit associated with tooth extraction took 36.7% of all. 3. As for the cause of medical dispute, uncomfortable feeling and dissatisfaction with the treatment showed 36.7%, death and permanent damage showed 16.7% each. 4. Winning the suit, compulsory mediation and recommendation for settlement took 60.0% of judgement result for the plaintiff. 5. For the type of medical organization in relation to medical dispute, 60.0% was found to be the private dental clinics, and 30.0% was university dental hospitals. 6. For the level of trial, dispute that progressed above 2 or 3 trials was of 30.0%. 7. For the amount of claim for damage, the claim amounting between 50 million to 100 million won was of 36.7%, and that of more than 100 million won was 13.3%, and in case of the judgement amount, the amount ranging from 10 million to 30 million won was of 40.0%, and that of more than 100 million won was of 6.7%. 8. For the number of dentist involved in the suit, 26.7% was of 2 or more dentists. 9. For the amount of time spent until the judgement, 46.7% took 11 to 20 months, and 36.7% took 21 to 30 months. 10. For medical malpractice, 46.7% was judged to be guilty, and 70% of the cases had undergone medical judgement or verification of the case by specialists during the process of the suit. 11. In the lost cases of doctors(18 cases), 72.2% was due to violence of carefulness in practice and 16.7% was due to missing of explanation to patient. Medical disputes occurring in the field of dentistry are usually of relatively less risky cases. Hence, the importance of explanation to patient is emphasized, and since the levels of patient satisfaction are subjective, improvement of the relationship between the patient and the dentist and recovery of autonomy within the group dentist are essential in addition to the reduction of technical malpractice. Moreover, management measure against the medical dispute should be set up through complement of the current doctors and hospitals medical malpractice insurance which is being conducted irrationally, and establishment of system in which education as well as consultation for medical disputes lead by the group of dental clinicians and academic scholars are accessible.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent283~296-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Korean Academy of Oral Medicine (대한구강내과학회지)-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.title치과임상영역에서 발생된 의료분쟁의 판례분석-
dc.title.alternativeThe Jurisdictional Precedent Analysis of Medical Dispute in Dental Field-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Oral Medicine (구강내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthor권병기-
dc.contributor.googleauthor안형준-
dc.contributor.googleauthor강진규-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김종열-
dc.contributor.googleauthor최종훈-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02273-
dc.contributor.localIdA04188-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01491-
dc.subject.keywordAutonomy-
dc.subject.keywordMedical dispute-
dc.subject.keywordCivil suit-
dc.subject.keywordRelationship-
dc.subject.keywordEducation-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameAhn, Hyoung Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Jong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorAhn, Hyoung Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Jong Hoon-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage283-
dc.citation.endPage296-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Korean Academy of Oral Medicine (대한구강내과학회지), Vol.31(4) : 283-296, 2006-
dc.identifier.rimsid54452-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine (구강내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.