113 194

Cited 2 times in

임상적으로 진행된 전립선암에서의 로봇 근치적 전립선적출술의 결과

Other Titles
 Outcomes of Robotic Prostatectomy for Treating Clinically Advanced Prostate Cancer 
Authors
 함원식  ;  박성열  ;  나군호  ;  최영득 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Urology (대한비뇨기과학회지), Vol.49(4) : 325-329, 2008 
Journal Title
 Korean Journal of Urology (대한비뇨기과학회지) 
ISSN
 2005-6737 
Issue Date
2008
Keywords
Prostatic neoplasms ; Open radical prostatectomy ; Robotic radical prostatectomy
Abstract
PURPOSE: Robotic prostatectomy(RP) has been widely performed for treating clinically localized prostate cancer(PC), whereas for treating clinically advanced PC, prostatectomy is usually done by open methods. We evaluated the outcomes of RP for treating patients with clinically advanced PC as compared with the outcomes of RP for treating patients with clinically localized PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed RP in 273 patients with the da Vinci(R) robot system through a transperitoneal approach. Ninety-two patients had clinically advanced PC(Group I) and 181 patients had clinically localized PC(Group II). We compared the perioperative variables and early surgical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups did not show significant differences for their mean age, but the mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen(PSA) levels and biopsy Gleason scores were significantly higher in Group I. There were no significant differences in the mean operation time(Group I: 214.9+/-45.1 min, II: 217.8+/-49.0 min, p=0.709), the estimated blood loss(Group I: 382.8+/-281.5ml, II: 387.5+/-369.5ml, p=0.934), the duration of bladder catheterization (Group I: 12.0+/-2.8 days, II: 12.9+/-4.6 days, p=0.232), the hospital stay(Group I: 5.9+/-3.5 days, II: 5.0+/-2.4 days, p=0.154), and the time to start the postoperative regular diet(Group I: 2.5+/-1.5 days, II: 2.0+/-0.6 days, p=0.089) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in lymph node invasion(p<0.001), but no difference in the positive surgical margin(p= 0.180). Two out of the 4 intraoperative rectal injuries occurred in the clinically advanced PC group, but they were closed primarily without specific problems, except for 1 case. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that RP may be performed safely for patients with clinically advanced PC
Files in This Item:
T200800336.pdf Download
DOI
10.4111/kju.2008.49.4.325
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Koon Ho(나군호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-7584
Park, Sung Yul(박성열)
Choi, Young Deuk(최영득) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-5797
Ham, Won Sik(함원식) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-8838
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/106492
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse