1 315

Cited 955 times in

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김주항-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T17:29:07Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-24T17:29:07Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/105487-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease. METHODS: This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804. FINDINGS: All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. FUNDING: Eli Lilly.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1432~1440-
dc.relation.isPartOfLANCET-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Agents/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHDouble-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHFatigue/chemically induced-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGlutamates/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHGlutamates/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHGuanine/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHGuanine/analogs & derivatives*-
dc.subject.MESHGuanine/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHNeutropenia/chemically induced-
dc.subject.MESHPemetrexed-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHProportional Hazards Models-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleMaintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTudor Ciuleanu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThomas Brodowicz-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChristoph Zielinski-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hang Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMaciej Krzakowski-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEckart Laack-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi-Long Wu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIsabel Bover-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStephen Begbie-
dc.contributor.googleauthorValentina Tzekova-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBranka Cucevic-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJose Rodrigues Pereira-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hyun Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJayaprakash Madhavan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKatherine P Sugarman-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPatrick Peterson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWilliam J John-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKurt Krejcy-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChandra P Belani-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61497-5-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00945-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02152-
dc.identifier.eissn1474-547X-
dc.identifier.pmid19767093-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673609614975-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Joo Hang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Joo Hang-
dc.citation.volume374-
dc.citation.number9699-
dc.citation.startPage1432-
dc.citation.endPage1440-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLANCET, Vol.374(9699) : 1432-1440, 2009-
dc.identifier.rimsid44302-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.