1115 1534

Cited 3439 times in

Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author노재경-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T17:09:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-24T17:09:30Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/104867-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and sought associations between the mutation status of the KRAS gene in tumors and clinical response to cetuximab. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases to receive FOLFIRI either alone or in combination with cetuximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 599 patients received cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, and 599 received FOLFIRI alone. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival in the cetuximab-FOLFIRI group as compared with the FOLFIRI group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.99; P=0.048). There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07; P=0.31). There was a significant interaction between treatment group and KRAS mutation status for tumor response (P=0.03) but not for progression-free survival (P=0.07) or overall survival (P=0.44). The hazard ratio for progression-free survival among patients with wild-type-KRAS tumors was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94), in favor of the cetuximab-FOLFIRI group. The following grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI than with FOLFIRI alone: skin reactions (which were grade 3 only) (in 19.7% vs. 0.2% of patients, P<0.001), infusion-related reactions (in 2.5% vs. 0%, P<0.001), and diarrhea (in 15.7% vs. 10.5%, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: First-line treatment with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, as compared with FOLFIRI alone, reduced the risk of progression of metastatic colorectal cancer. The benefit of cetuximab was limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1408~1417-
dc.relation.isPartOfNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHCamptothecin/analogs & derivatives-
dc.subject.MESHCamptothecin/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCetuximab-
dc.subject.MESHColorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHColorectal Neoplasms/genetics-
dc.subject.MESHDisease Progression-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHGenes, ras*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKaplan-Meier Estimate-
dc.subject.MESHLeucovorin/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMutation-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHReceptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors*-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleCetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEric Van Cutsem-
dc.contributor.googleauthorClaus-Henning Köhne-
dc.contributor.googleauthorErika Hitre-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJerzy Zaluski-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung-Rong Chang Chien-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAnatoly Makhson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGeert D’Haens-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTamás Pintér-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRobert Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyörgy Bodoky-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Kyung Roh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGunnar Folprecht-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPaul Ruff-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChristopher Stroh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSabine Tejpar-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMichael Schlichting-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJohannes Nippgen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPhilippe Rougier-
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa0805019-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01290-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02371-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4406-
dc.identifier.pmid19339720-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRoh, Jae Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRoh, Jae Kyung-
dc.citation.volume360-
dc.citation.number14-
dc.citation.startPage1408-
dc.citation.endPage1417-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.360(14) : 1408-1417, 2009-
dc.identifier.rimsid42533-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.