693 720

Cited 182 times in

Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author장양수-
dc.contributor.author최동훈-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T16:40:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-24T16:40:44Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0009-7322-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/103966-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Whether triple antiplatelet therapy is superior or similar to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 4203 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were analyzed retrospectively in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They received either dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel; dual group; n=2569) or triple (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus cilostazol; triple group; n=1634) antiplatelet therapy. The triple group received additional cilostazol at least for 1 month. Various major adverse cardiac events at 8 months were compared between these 2 groups. Compared with the dual group, the triple group had a similar incidence of major bleeding events but a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital mortality. Clinical outcomes at 8 months showed that the triple group had significantly lower incidences of cardiac death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.84; P=0.007), total death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.89; P=0.010), and total major adverse cardiac events (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.95; P=0.019) than the dual group. Subgroup analysis showed that older (>65 years old), female, and diabetic patients got more benefits from triple antiplatelet therapy than their counterparts who received dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Triple antiplatelet therapy seems to be superior to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. These results may provide the rationale for the use of triple antiplatelet therapy in these patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent3207~3214-
dc.relation.isPartOfCIRCULATION-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAngioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*-
dc.subject.MESHAspirin/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCombined Modality Therapy-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Thrombosis/prevention & control*-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Therapy, Combination-
dc.subject.MESHDrug-Eluting Stents*-
dc.subject.MESHElectrocardiography-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHProportional Hazards Models-
dc.subject.MESHRegistries-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTetrazoles/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHTiclopidine/analogs & derivatives-
dc.subject.MESHTiclopidine/therapeutic use-
dc.titleTriple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKang-Yin Chen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Woon Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong-Jian Li-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKanhaiya L. Poddar-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZhe Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoshiyasu Minami-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLin Wang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEung Ju Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Gyu Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong Seog Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Joo Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyung Ho Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Keun Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaek Jong Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Jo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Ho Hur-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Whan Seong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJei Keon Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong Chan Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang Ho Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Hoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYang Soo Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Ho Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChong Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Han Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWook Sung Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Bae Seung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Jung Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03448-
dc.contributor.localIdA04053-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00533-
dc.identifier.eissn1524-4539-
dc.identifier.pmid19528339-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.citation.volume119-
dc.citation.number25-
dc.citation.startPage3207-
dc.citation.endPage3214-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCIRCULATION, Vol.119(25) : 3207-3214, 2009-
dc.identifier.rimsid46730-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.